HRES 653 · 109th Congress 2005–2007, ended

Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).

Latest action · Feb 1, 2006 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedJan 31, 2006
  2. Agreed to in HouseFeb 1, 2006

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to S. 1932 (providing for reconciliation under the concurrent resolution on the budget for FY2006).

Recorded votes 2

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 4Passed216–214Feb 1, 2006
House 2On Consideration of the ResolutionPassed226–201Feb 1, 2006

Yea 226

Nay 201

Cosponsors

Members who signed on, in the order they did.

No cosponsors are on file for this measure.

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseRules Committee
Reported as an original measure Jan 31, 2006

Actions 14

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Feb 1, 2006By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mr. Putnam called up H. Res. 653 and asked for its immediate consideration.
  2. Feb 1, 2006POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CONSIDERATION - Mr. McDermott stated that the provisions of H. Res. 653 violate the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by imposing an unfunded mandate and made a point of order against the consideration of the resolution. Subsequently, the Chair noted that the required threshhold of identifying the specific language in question had been met, and the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the question of consideration.
  3. Feb 1, 2006On motion to consider the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 201 (Roll no. 2).
  4. Feb 1, 2006Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H37-60)
  5. Feb 1, 2006DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 653.
  6. Feb 1, 2006The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H60)
  7. Feb 1, 2006POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 653, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Slaughter demanded the Yeas and Nays and the Chair announced that further proceedings on the question of adoption of the resolution would be postponed until later in the legislative day.
  8. Feb 1, 2006Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H68)
  9. Feb 1, 2006Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 214 (Roll no. 4). (text: CR H37)
  10. Feb 1, 2006Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  11. Jan 31, 2006Introduced in House
  12. Jan 31, 2006The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 109-366, by Mr. Putnam.
  13. Jan 31, 2006Upon adoption of the resolution, the House shall be deemed to have agreed to the Senate amendment to the House amendment to S. 1932.
  14. Jan 31, 2006Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 142.

In the Congressional Record 4

Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H351Text printed H351Motions H352Recorded votes H352beginJohn A. Boehner R-OH (motion), Nancy Pelosi D-CAFeb 16, 2006
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E146Lucille Roybal-Allard D-CAFeb 14, 2006
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E78, E80Mario Diaz-Balart R-FL, Wally Herger R-CAFeb 7, 2006
House · ExtensionsDebate and remarks E55, H37–H60Text printed H37Recorded votes H40, H68concur in Senate amendment (H. Res. 653), question of consideration (McDermott point of order relative to unfunded Federal mandates)Rulings of the chair H37Adam H. Putnam R-FL, Ander Crenshaw R-FL, Artur Davis D-AL, Bob Etheridge D-NC, Chris Van Hollen D-MD, Christopher Shays R-CT, Danny K. Davis D-IL, Dennis J. Kucinich D-OH, Doris O. Matsui D-CA, Edolphus Towns D-NY, Edward J. Markey D-MA, Edward R. Royce R-CA, Fortney Pete Stark D-CA, George Miller D-CA, Harold E. Ford Jr. D-TN, Hilda L. Solis D-CA, James P. Moran D-VA, Jeb Hensarling R-TX, Jim Cooper D-TN, Jim McDermott D-WA, Jim Nussle R-IA, Jim Ryun R-KS, Joe Barton R-TX, John D. Dingell D-MI, John M. Spratt, Jr. D-SC, Louise McIntosh Slaughter D-NY, Lynn C. Woolsey D-CA, Mike Pence R-IN, Nancy Pelosi D-CA, Nathan Deal R-GA, Rahm Emanuel D-IL, Rob Bishop R-UT, Rosa L. DeLauro D-CT, Sam Farr D-CA, Sander M. Levin D-MI, Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX, Solomon P. Ortiz D-TX, Spencer Bachus R-AL, Steny H. Hoyer D-MD, Tim Ryan D-OH, William M. Thomas R-CAFeb 1, 2006

Research

What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Committee report

CRS reports 1

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this resolution or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 1

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

ProductTitleKindPublished
R40957Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: History, Impact, and Issues ArchivedReportFeb 23, 2021

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 1932Deficit Reduction Act of 2005Procedurally relatedFeb 8, 2006

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Congress.

Text 2

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Feb 1, 2006Engrossed in House
  2. Jan 31, 2006Reported in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.