Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003
Latest action · Apr 8, 2003 Laid on the table. See S. 380 for further action.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedFeb 12, 2003
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
(Sec. 3) Requires that savings accruing to the Postal Service and attributable to FY 2003 and 2004 be used to reduce the postal debt.
Prohibits the Postal Service from incurring additional debt to offset the use of the savings to reduce the postal debt in FY 2003 and 2004.
Requires that: (1) savings attributable to FY 2005 be used to continue holding postage rates unchanged and to reduce the postal debt; and (2) savings attributable to any fiscal year after FY 2005 be considered Postal Service operating expenses and, until otherwise provided for by law, be held in escrow and not be obligated or expended.
Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) the savings accruing to the Postal Service as a result of the enactment of this Act will be sufficient to allow the Postal Service to fulfill its commitment to hold postage rates unchanged until at least 2006; (2) because the Postal Service still faces substantial obligations related to postretirement health benefits for its current and former employees, some portion of those savings should be used to address the unfunded obligations; and (3) none of the savings should be used to pay bonuses to Postal Service executives.
Directs the Postal Service to submit to the President and Congress its proposal detailing how any savings accruing to it as a result of the enactment of this Act, which are attributable to any fiscal year after FY 2005, should be expended. Requires the General Accounting Office to evaluate such proposal for specified congressional committees, and Congress, after receiving both proposal and evaluation, to revisit the question of how the savings should be used.
Requires the Postmaster General to report to Congress how the Postal Service proposes to use any surplus determined by the Office of Management and Budget as of the end of FY 2025, or any earlier date by which all postal employees under the Civil Service Retirement System will have retired.
Cosponsors 80
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Feb 12, 2003 to Mar 27, 2003; 3 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-IL | Danny K. Davis | Original | Feb 12, 2003 |
| D-CA | Henry A. Waxman | Original | Feb 12, 2003 |
| R-VA | Tom Davis | Original | Feb 12, 2003 |
| D-NY | Carolyn B. Maloney | Feb 25, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Edolphus Towns | Feb 25, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Steve Israel | Feb 25, 2003 | |
| R-AZ | Jim Kolbe | Feb 26, 2003 | |
| R-OK | John Sullivan | Feb 27, 2003 | |
| R-MI | Candice S. Miller | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| R-CT | Christopher Shays | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| R-VA | Edward L. Schrock | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Ellen O. Tauscher | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| R-NY | Jack Quinn | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Major R. Owens | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| R-IA | Tom Latham | Mar 4, 2003 | |
| R-FL | Adam H. Putnam | Mar 5, 2003 | |
| R-IN | Dan Burton | Mar 5, 2003 | |
| R-NY | James T. Walsh | Mar 5, 2003 | |
| D-OH | Marcy Kaptur | Mar 5, 2003 | |
| R-OH | Deborah Pryce | Mar 6, 2003 | |
| R-IA | James A. Leach | Mar 6, 2003 | |
| D-MA | Stephen F. Lynch | Mar 6, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Tom Lantos | Mar 6, 2003 | |
| D-MO | Wm. Lacy Clay | Mar 6, 2003 | |
| R-NY | Amo Houghton | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| D-OR | Earl Blumenauer | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| R-NJ | Frank A. LoBiondo | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| R-NJ | Jim Saxton | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| D-CT | John B. Larson | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| R-FL | Lincoln Diaz-Balart | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| D-TX | Martin Frost | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| D-PA | Tim Holden | Mar 11, 2003 | |
| R-WI | F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. | Mar 12, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Jose E. Serrano | Mar 12, 2003 | |
| D-WV | Nick J. Rahall II | Mar 12, 2003 | |
| D-NJ | Rush Holt | Mar 12, 2003 | |
| R-PA | Todd Russell Platts | Mar 12, 2003 | |
| R-VA | Frank R. Wolf | Mar 13, 2003 | |
| R-NJ | Mike Ferguson | Mar 13, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Carolyn McCarthy | Mar 18, 2003 | |
| R-UT | Chris Cannon | Mar 18, 2003 | |
| D-NC | David E. Price | Mar 18, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Diane E. Watson | Mar 18, 2003 | |
| D-IL | Lane Evans | Mar 18, 2003 | |
| D-DC | Eleanor Holmes Norton | Mar 19, 2003 | |
| D-IN | Peter J. Visclosky | Mar 19, 2003 | |
| D-MA | Barney Frank | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-AZ | Ed Pastor | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Eliot L. Engel | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| R-NH | Jeb Bradley | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-IL | Jerry F. Costello | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-PA | Paul E. Kanjorski | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| R-LA | Richard H. Baker | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-NJ | Robert E. Andrews | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| D-NJ | Robert Menendez | Mar 20, 2003 | |
| R-IL | Donald A. Manzullo | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| D-MA | James P. McGovern | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Juanita Millender-McDonald | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Louise McIntosh Slaughter | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| D-NY | Michael R. McNulty | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| R-WI | Paul D. Ryan | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| R-TX | Pete Sessions | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Robert T. Matsui | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| R-NY | Sherwood Boehlert | Mar 25, 2003 | |
| R-KY | Ernie Fletcher | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-TX | Henry Bonilla | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-MO | Ike Skelton | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-GA | Johnny Isakson | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-NE | Lee Terry | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-TN | Lincoln Davis | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-MN | Mark R. Kennedy | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-CA | Mike Thompson | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-PA | Phil English | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-WA | Rick Larsen | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-AZ | Rick Renzi | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-ME | Thomas H. Allen | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| R-TN | Zach Wamp | Mar 26, 2003 | |
| D-ME | Michael H. Michaud | Mar 27, 2003 | |
| R-IN | Mike Pence | Mar 27, 2003 | |
| R-VA | Virgil H. Goode Jr. | Mar 27, 2003 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Oversight and Government Reform Committee | Referred Feb 12, 2003Markup Mar 6, 2003Reported Mar 27, 2003 |
Actions 7
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Apr 8, 2003Laid on the table. See S. 380 for further action.
- Mar 27, 2003Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 108-49.
- Mar 27, 2003Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 30.
- Mar 6, 2003Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- Mar 6, 2003Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
In the Congressional Record 4
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Amendments H2908 | Henry A. Waxman D-CA (amendment) | Apr 8, 2003 |
| House | Debate and remarks H2555Amendments H2587 | David Dreier R-CA, Henry A. Waxman D-CA (amendment), Tom Davis R-VA (amendment) | Apr 1, 2003 |
| House | Debate and remarks H2444 | David Dreier R-CA | Mar 27, 2003 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E229 | Henry A. Waxman D-CA | Feb 13, 2003 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 2
- Mar 14, 2003H.R. 735, Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Government Reform on March 6, 2003</p>
- Mar 14, 2003H.R. 735, Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Government Reform on March 6, 2003
Printed hearings 1
Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.
| Number | Hearing | Committee | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serial No. 108-7 | MEMBERS' DAY121 pages | Budget Committee | Mar 6, 2003 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 380 | Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003 | Related bill | Apr 23, 2003 |
Titles 3
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To amend chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, to reform the funding of benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System for employees of the United States Postal Service, and for other purposes.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003
- Short Titles as Reported to House
- Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
- Accounting
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Budget surpluses
- Capital investments
- Civil service retirement
- Congress
- Congressional investigations
- Congressional reporting requirements
- Cost control
- Economic forecasting
- Economics and Public Finance
- Executive compensation
- Federal employees
- Finance and Financial Sector
- Fringe benefits
- Government employees' health insurance
- Government liability
- Government Operations and Politics
- Government paperwork
- Government spending reductions
- Government trust funds
- Health
- Inflation
- Investment of public funds
- Labor and Employment
- Legislation
- Military pensions
- Payroll deductions
- Planning
- Postal service
- Productivity in government
- Public debt
- Retiree health benefits
- Social Welfare
- United States Postal Service
- Valuation
- Volunteer workers
- Wages
Text 2
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Mar 27, 2003Reported in House
- Feb 12, 2003Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.