HR 520 · 115th Congress 2017–2019, ended

National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act

Fact sheet

Latest action · Apr 11, 2018 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 482.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 13, 2017
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act

This bill addresses the mine permitting process.

Under the bill, projects that provide minerals vital to job creation, energy infrastructure, American economic competitiveness, and national security must be considered to be "infrastructure projects" as described in Executive Order 13604, entitled "Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects" dated March 22, 2012. This order directed federal agencies to significantly reduce the time required to make permitting and review decisions on infrastructure projects.

The bill sets forth general requirements for an existing mineral exploration or mine permit application.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or the Forest Service shall appoint a project lead for the mine permitting process to coordinate with other agencies to ensure that the agencies: minimize delays, set and adhere to timelines for completion of the permitting process, set clear permitting goals, and track progress against goals.

The requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 are satisfied if the BLM or the Forest Service determines that the agency issuing the permit will address specified factors, such as environmental impact, alternatives to issuance of the permit, or any irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources that would be involved in the proposed action. The time period for completion of the mine permitting review process shall not exceed 30 months, except by mutual agreement.

Projects on National Forest System land shall be exempt from regulations that prohibit timber tree cutting and road construction in areas without roads.

The bill does not apply to oil, gas, and potash leasing and development within the designated potash areas of Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico.

Cosponsors 36

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 23, 2017 to Apr 26, 2017.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-TXBill FloresJan 23, 2017
R-ARBruce WestermanJan 23, 2017
R-WACathy McMorris RodgersJan 23, 2017
R-AKDon YoungJan 23, 2017
R-CADoug LaMalfaJan 23, 2017
R-CODoug LambornJan 23, 2017
R-SCJeff DuncanJan 23, 2017
R-NDKevin CramerJan 23, 2017
R-AZPaul A. GosarJan 23, 2017
R-CAPaul CookJan 23, 2017
R-COScott R. TiptonJan 23, 2017
R-NMStevan PearceJan 23, 2017
R-IDRaul R. LabradorJan 24, 2017
R-WIF. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.Jan 30, 2017
R-IDMichael K. SimpsonJan 30, 2017

Actions 9

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Apr 11, 2018Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 482.
  2. Apr 11, 2018Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-631.
  3. Mar 7, 2018Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  4. Mar 7, 2018Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 16.
  5. Mar 7, 2018Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged.

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 145National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production ActIdentical billJan 12, 2017

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources.

Text 2

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Apr 11, 2018Reported in House
  2. Jan 13, 2017Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.