EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011
Latest action · Oct 18, 2011 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 201.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJun 21, 2011
- Passed HouseOct 13, 2011
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on September 26, 2011. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011 - Provides that the following rules shall have no force or effect and shall be treated as though they had never taken effect: (1) the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters; (2) the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; (3) the Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; and (4) Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste.
Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in place of such rules, to promulgate and finalize on the date that is 15 months after the date of the enactment of this Act regulations for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters and commercial and industrial solid waste incinerator units subject to such rules, that: (1) establish maximum achievable control technology standards, performance standards, and other requirements for hazardous air pollutants or solid waste combustion under the Clean Air Act; and (2) identify non-hazardous secondary materials that, when used as fuels or ingredients in combustion units of such boilers, heaters, or incinerator units, are solid waste under the Solid Waste Disposal Act for purposes of determining the extent to which such combustion units are required to meet emission standards for such pollutants under such Act. Requires the Administrator to establish a date for compliance with standards and requirements under such regulations, which shall be no earlier than five years after such a regulation's effective date, after considering compliance costs, non-air quality health and environmental impacts and energy requirements, the feasibility of implementation, the availability of equipment, suppliers, and labor, and potential net employment impacts.
Treats the date on which the Administrator proposes such a regulation establishing an emission standard as the proposal date for purposes of applying the definition of a "new source" to hazardous air pollutants requirements or of a "new solid waste incineration unit" to solid waste combustion requirements under the Clean Air Act.
Requires the Administrator, in promulgating such regulations, to: (1) adopt the definitions of "commercial and industrial solid waste incineration unit," "commercial and industrial waste," and "contained gaseous material" in the rule entitled Standards for Performance of New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; (2) identify non-hazardous secondary material to be solid waste only if the material meets such definitions; (3) ensure that emissions standards for existing and new sources can be met under actual operating conditions consistently and concurrently with emission standards for all other air pollutants regulated by the rule for the source category, taking into account variability in actual source performance, source design, fuels, inputs, controls, ability to measure the pollutant emissions, and operating conditions; and (4) impose the least burdensome regulatory alternative.
Recorded votes 16
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 791 | On Passage | Passed275–142 | Oct 13, 2011 |
| House 790 | On Motion to Recommit with Instructions | Failed170–246 | Oct 13, 2011 |
| House 787 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed174–250 | Oct 13, 2011 |
| House 779 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed156–262 | Oct 11, 2011 |
| House 778 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed169–249 | Oct 11, 2011 |
Cosponsors 126
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jun 21, 2011 to Sep 22, 2011; 7 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-WA | Cathy McMorris Rodgers | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| D-NC | G. K. Butterfield | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| D-UT | Jim Matheson | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| D-GA | John Barrow | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| D-AR | Mike Ross | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| R-TX | Pete Olson | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| R-LA | Steve Scalise | Original | Jun 21, 2011 |
| R-IL | Adam Kinzinger | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| D-OK | Dan Boren | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| R-WI | Reid J. Ribble | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| D-PA | Tim Holden | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| R-CA | Wally Herger | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| R-OH | Bob Gibbs | Jun 23, 2011 | |
| R-KY | Ed Whitfield | Jun 23, 2011 | |
| R-WA | Jaime Herrera Beutler | Jun 23, 2011 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Energy and Commerce Committee | Referred Jun 21, 2011Markup Sep 21, 2011Reported Sep 26, 2011 |
| Energy Subcommittee | Referred Jun 22, 2011Hearings Sep 8, 2011Reported Sep 13, 2011 |
Actions 82
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Oct 18, 2011Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 201.
- Oct 17, 2011Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
- Oct 13, 2011Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6881-6882)
- Oct 13, 2011The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
- Oct 13, 2011The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2250.
In the Congressional Record 17
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Debate and remarks H635 | Cory Gardner R-CO | Feb 8, 2012 |
| House | Debate and remarks H358 | Greg Walden R-OR | Feb 1, 2012 |
| House | Debate and remarks H7318 | Cory Gardner R-CO, Jaime Herrera Beutler R-WA | Nov 3, 2011 |
| Senate | Debate and remarks S6623 | Harry Reid D-NV | Oct 18, 2011 |
| Senate | Debate and remarks S6621 | Harry Reid D-NV | Oct 17, 2011 |
| House · Extensions | Debate and remarks E1867, H6929 | Betty McCollum D-MN, Jeff Duncan R-SC | Oct 14, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6881, H6903–H6906Motions H6903Recorded votes H6881, H6905Castor motion to recommit (require incinerators located near senior living facilities to use effective pollution control methods and provide community notification on incinerator emissions)Cohen amendment (consider potential reductions in illness-related absences from work when establishing a compliance date for boiler, process heater, and incinerator achievable standards) | Ed Whitfield R-KY, Kathy Castor D-FL (motion) | Oct 13, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6841, H6842Amendments H6842 | Ed Whitfield R-KY, Steve Cohen D-TN (amendment) | Oct 12, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6698–H6727Amendments H6698, H6699, H6700, H6702, H6705, H6706, H6707, H6708Recorded votes H6722, H6723, H6724, H6725, H6726Markey amendment (continue to require industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators to reduce emissions if such emissions are increasing cancer risks)Edwards amendment (recognize that the increased demand for the manufacture and installation of equipment to reduce air pollution has created jobs)Ellison amendment (set date for compliance with regulations for boilers, process heaters, and incinerators sooner than five years if they create jobs)Jackson Lee amendment (shorten compliance date to provide additional time to issue achievable standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators)Waxman amendment (provide an offset for funding required to issue new standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators) | Donna F. Edwards D-MD (amendment), Ed Whitfield R-KY, Edward J. Markey D-MA (amendment), Gerald E. Connolly D-VA (amendment), H. Morgan Griffith R-VA, Henry A. Waxman D-CA (amendment), Janice D. Schakowsky D-IL (amendment), Keith Ellison D-MN (amendment), Mike Quigley D-IL (amendment), Peter Welch D-VT (amendment), Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX (amendment) | Oct 11, 2011 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E1807 | Chris Van Hollen D-MD | Oct 7, 2011 |
| House · Extensions | Debate and remarks E1786, E1795, E1796, E1802, H6631–H6638, H6644–H6661Text printed H6644Amendments H6644, H6645, H6651, H6652, H6653, H6654Recorded votes H6658, H6659, H6660Capps amendment (include findings for health costs and benefits resulting from implementing standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators)Hahn amendment (maintain current air quality standards for boilers, process heaters, and incinerators in certain metropolitan areas with worst air quality rankings)Rush amendment (clarify that proposal for additional time to issue achievable standards for boilers, process heaters, and incinerators does not supersede authority to regulate air pollution) | Anna G. Eshoo D-CA, Bobby L. Rush D-IL (amendment), Candice S. Miller R-MI, Carolyn B. Maloney D-NY, Cathy McMorris Rodgers R-WA, David P. Roe R-TN, Donna F. Edwards D-MD, Donna M. Christensen D-VI, Earl Blumenauer D-OR, Ed Whitfield R-KY, Edward J. Markey D-MA, H. Morgan Griffith R-VA, Henry A. Waxman D-CA (amendment), Jaime Herrera Beutler R-WA, James P. Moran D-VA, Janice Hahn D-CA (amendment), John Barrow D-GA, Kathy Castor D-FL, Keith Ellison D-MN, Lois Capps D-CA (amendment), Lucille Roybal-Allard D-CA, Michael F. Doyle D-PA (amendment), Mike Pence R-IN, Niki Tsongas D-MA, Pete Olson R-TX, Phil Gingrey R-GA, Ralph M. Hall R-TX, Robert E. Latta R-OH, Rosa L. DeLauro D-CT, Rush Holt D-NJ, Sean P. Duffy R-WI, Steve Scalise R-LA, Timothy H. Bishop D-NY, Wally Herger R-CA | Oct 6, 2011 |
| House · Extensions | Debate and remarks E1773, E1776, H6559, H6575, H6580, H6584, H6586, H6594, H6620 | Bill Flores R-TX, F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. R-WI, Henry A. Waxman D-CA, Jo Bonner R-AL, John Lewis D-GA, John R. Carter R-TX, Judy Chu D-CA, Lee Terry R-NE, Mazie K. Hirono D-HI | Oct 5, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6523–H6528, H6540–H6542Text printed H6523Amendments H6552, H6553, H6554Recorded votes H6532 | Alcee L. Hastings D-FL, Bobby L. Rush D-IL (amendment), Donna F. Edwards D-MD (amendment), Earl Blumenauer D-OR (amendment), Frank Pallone, Jr. D-NJ (amendment), Gerald E. Connolly D-VA (amendment), Henry A. Waxman D-CA (amendment), Jackie Speier D-CA (amendment), Janice D. Schakowsky D-IL (amendment), Janice Hahn D-CA (amendment), John Shimkus R-IL, Keith Ellison D-MN (amendment), Lois Capps D-CA (amendment), Martha Roby R-AL, Michael F. Doyle D-PA (amendment), Mike Quigley D-IL (amendment), Peter Welch D-VT (amendment), Richard B. Nugent R-FL, Rob Woodall R-GA, Sean P. Duffy R-WI, Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX (amendment), Steve Cohen D-TN (amendment), Tim Griffin R-AR | Oct 4, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6378 | Bobby L. Rush D-IL | Sep 22, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6089 | John R. Carter R-TX | Sep 12, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H5954 | John R. Carter R-TX | Sep 7, 2011 |
| House | Debate and remarks H4521 | Martha Roby R-AL | Jun 23, 2011 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
Congressional Budget Office cost estimate
- Sep 23, 2011H.R. 2250, EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on September 21, 2011
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H4365.
Printed hearings 4
Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.
| Number | Hearing | Committee | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Hrg. 112-371 | SIEMINSKI, BURKE, CLARK, AND NORRIS NOMINATIONS95 pages | Energy and Natural Resources Committee | Mar 20, 2012 |
| Serial No. 112-49 | EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR JOB CREATION94 pages | Education and Workforce Committee | Feb 1, 2012 |
| Serial No. 112-95 | CUTTING EPA SPENDING124 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Oct 12, 2011 |
| Serial No. 112-82 | H.R. 2250, THE EPA REGULATORY RELIEF ACT OF 2011, AND H.R. 2681, THE CEMENT SECTOR REGULATORY RELIEF ACT OF 2011324 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Sep 8, 2011 |
CRS reports 4
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 4
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R42895 | Clean Air Issues in the 113th Congress: An Overview Archived | Report | Jan 6, 2015 |
| R41459 | EPA’s Boiler MACT: Controlling Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants Archived | Report | Jan 30, 2013 |
| R41563 | Clean Air Issues in the 112th Congress Archived | Report | Dec 31, 2012 |
| R41861 | Defense: FY2012 Budget Request, Authorization and Appropriations Archived | Report | Feb 13, 2012 |
Amendments 16
Amendments offered to this bill.
Related bills 8
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRES 419 | Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2681) to provide additional time for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to issue achievable standards for cement manufacturing facilities, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2250) to provide additional time for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to issue achievable standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators, and for other purposes. | Procedurally related | Oct 4, 2011 |
| S 1392 | EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011 | Related bill | Jul 20, 2011 |
| S 1610 | Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act of 2011 | Related bill | Sep 22, 2011 |
| S 1786 | Long-Term Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 | Related bill | Nov 3, 2011 |
| S 1960 | Jobs Creation Act | Related bill | Dec 7, 2011 |
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To provide additional time for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to issue achievable standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers, process heaters, and incinerators, and for other purposes.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Environmental Protection.
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures
- Air quality
- Energy efficiency and conservation
- Environmental Protection
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Environmental regulatory procedures
- Environmental technology
- Hazardous wastes and toxic substances
- Industrial facilities
- Solid waste and recycling
Text 4
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Oct 18, 2011Placed on Calendar Senate
- Oct 13, 2011Engrossed in House
- Sep 26, 2011Reported in House
- Jun 21, 2011Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.