Child Custody Protection Act
Latest action · Apr 17, 2002 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedFeb 6, 2001
- Passed HouseApr 17, 2002
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Specifies that neither the minor transported nor her parent may be prosecuted or sued for a violation of this Act.
Makes it an affirmative defense to a prosecution for, or to a civil action based on, such a violation that the defendant reasonably believed that before the individual obtained the abortion, the parental consent or notification or judicial authorization that would have been required had the abortion been performed in the State where the individual resides, took place.
Authorizes any parent who suffers legal harm from a violation to obtain appropriate relief in a civil action. Defines "parent" to include a guardian, legal custodian, or person standing in loco parentis who has care and control of the minor, and with whom the minor regularly resides, who is designated by such law as a person to whom notification, or from whom consent, is required.
Recorded votes 2
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 97 | On Passage | Passed260–161 | Apr 17, 2002 |
| House 96 | On Motion to Recommit with Instructions | Failed173–246 | Apr 17, 2002 |
Cosponsors 98
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Feb 6, 2001 to Mar 19, 2002; 50 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-AR | Asa Hutchinson | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-VA | Bob Goodlatte | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-AL | Bob Riley | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-CO | Bob Schaffer | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-GA | Charles W. Norwood | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-FL | Cliff Stearns | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-IN | Dan Burton | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-MI | Dave Camp | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| D-IL | David D. Phelps | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-VA | Eric Cantor | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-OK | Ernest J. Istook Jr. | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-KY | Ernie Fletcher | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-MN | Gil Gutknecht | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-IL | Henry J. Hyde | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
| R-AZ | J. D. Hayworth | Original | Feb 6, 2001 |
Committees 2
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Judiciary Committee | Referred Feb 6, 2001Markup Mar 20, 2002Reported Apr 11, 2002 |
| Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee | Referred Feb 16, 2001Hearings Sep 6, 2001Markup Feb 7, 2002Reported Feb 7, 2002 | |
| Senate | Judiciary Committee | Referred Apr 17, 2002 |
Actions 23
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Apr 17, 2002Rule H. Res. 388 passed House.
- Apr 17, 2002Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 388. (consideration: CR H1351-1373)
- Apr 17, 2002Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 476 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
- Apr 17, 2002GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 388, the House proceeded with 2 hours of general debate on H.R. 476.
- Apr 17, 2002The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- Apr 17, 2002Ms. Jackson-Lee (TX) moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
- Apr 17, 2002Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson-Lee motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion require the bill to be reported back to the House forthwith with an amendment to insert provisions stating that the prohibitions in the bill do not apply with respect to conduct by an adult sibling, a grandparent, or a minister, rabbi, pastor, priest, or other religious leader of the minor.
- Apr 17, 2002The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
- Apr 17, 2002On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 173 - 246 (Roll no. 96). (text: CR H1369)
- Apr 17, 2002Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 260 - 161 (Roll no. 97). (text: CR H1351-1352)
- Apr 17, 2002Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Apr 17, 2002Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Apr 16, 2002Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 388 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 476 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
- Apr 11, 2002Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-397.
- Apr 11, 2002Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 236.
- Mar 20, 2002Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- Mar 20, 2002Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 6.
- Feb 7, 2002Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- Feb 7, 2002Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
- Sep 6, 2001Subcommittee Hearings Held.
- Feb 16, 2001Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.
- Feb 6, 2001Introduced in House
- Feb 6, 2001Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In the Congressional Record 3
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 2
- Mar 22, 2002H.R. 476, Child Custody Protection Act<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on March 20, 2002</p>
- Mar 22, 2002H.R. 476, Child Custody Protection ActCost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on March 20, 2002
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRES 388 | Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. | Procedurally related | Apr 17, 2002 |
Titles 4
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Child Custody Protection Act
- Short Titles as Reported to House
- Child Custody Protection Act
- Popular Titles
- Abortion Parental Notification bill
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement.
- Abortion
- Civil actions and liability
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Criminal liability
- Families
- Fines (Penalties)
- Government Operations and Politics
- Guardian and ward
- Interstate commerce
- Law
- Parent and child
- Prosecution
- Sentences (Criminal procedure)
- State courts
- State laws
- Transportation and Public Works
Text 4
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Apr 17, 2002Referred in Senate
- Apr 17, 2002Engrossed in House
- Apr 11, 2002Reported in House
- Feb 6, 2001Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.