HR 161 · 114th Congress 2015–2017, ended

Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act

Latest action · Jan 22, 2015 Received in the Senate.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 6, 2015
  2. Passed HouseJan 21, 2015
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act

Amends the Natural Gas Act to direct the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to approve or deny a certificate of public convenience and necessity for a prefiled project within 12 months after receiving a complete application that is ready to be processed.

Defines "prefiled project" as a project for the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of a natural gas pipeline with respect to which a prefiling docket number has been assigned by FERC pursuant to a prefiling process established by FERC for the purpose of facilitating the formal application process for obtaining a certificate of public convenience and necessity.

Requires the agency responsible for issuing any federal license, permit, or approval regarding the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of a project for which a certificate is sought to approve or deny issuance of the certificate within 90 days after FERC issues its final environmental document regarding the project.

Requires FERC to grant an agency request for a 30-day extension of the 90-day time period if the agency demonstrates that it cannot otherwise complete the process required to approve or deny the license, permit, or approval, and therefore will be compelled to deny it.

Authorizes FERC, in granting such an extension, to offer technical assistance to the agency in order to address conditions preventing completion of the application review.

Declares that, if the agency fails to approve or deny issuance of a permit, license, or approval within the prescribed time-frame, the license, permit, or approval shall take effect upon expiration of 30 days after the period's end.

Directs FERC to incorporate into the terms of a license, permit, or approval any conditions proffered by the agency that FERC does not find to be inconsistent with the final environmental document.

Recorded votes 2

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 41Passed253–169Jan 21, 2015
House 40Failed182–241Jan 21, 2015

Cosponsors 33

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 6, 2015 to Jan 20, 2015; 4 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-OHBill JohnsonOriginalJan 6, 2015
R-NYChris CollinsOriginalJan 6, 2015
R-WVDavid B. McKinleyOriginalJan 6, 2015
R-TXPete OlsonOriginalJan 6, 2015
R-MEBruce PoliquinJan 8, 2015
R-TXPete SessionsJan 8, 2015
R-NYTom ReedJan 8, 2015
R-UTChris StewartJan 12, 2015
R-CADoug LaMalfaJan 12, 2015
R-NDKevin CramerJan 12, 2015
R-PATim MurphyJan 12, 2015
R-PATom MarinoJan 12, 2015
R-MOBilly LongJan 13, 2015
R-TXBlake FarentholdJan 20, 2015
R-ALBradley ByrneJan 20, 2015
R-TNCharles J. "Chuck" FleischmannJan 20, 2015
R-LACharles W. Boustany, Jr.Jan 20, 2015
R-FLDavid W. JollyJan 20, 2015
R-CODoug LambornJan 20, 2015
R-SCJeff DuncanJan 20, 2015
R-MNJohn KlineJan 20, 2015
R-TXJohn R. CarterJan 20, 2015
R-NYLee M. ZeldinJan 20, 2015
R-OKMarkwayne MullinJan 20, 2015
R-AZMatt SalmonJan 20, 2015
R-PAMike KellyJan 20, 2015
R-AZPaul A. GosarJan 20, 2015
R-NYRichard L. HannaJan 20, 2015
R-OHRobert E. LattaJan 20, 2015
R-NCRobert PittengerJan 20, 2015
R-TXRoger WilliamsJan 20, 2015
R-MTRyan K. ZinkeJan 20, 2015
R-WISean P. DuffyJan 20, 2015

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseEnergy and Commerce Committee
Referred Jan 6, 2015
Energy Subcommittee
Referred Jan 9, 2015

Actions 15

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jan 22, 2015Received in the Senate.
  2. Jan 21, 2015Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 38. (consideration: CR H453-460)
  3. Jan 21, 2015The rule provides for one hour of debate each on H.R. 161 and H.R. 36. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bills. The resolution provides that the bills shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the bills. The resolution provides one motion to recommit per bill.
  4. Jan 21, 2015DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 38, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 161.
  5. Jan 21, 2015The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H458)

In the Congressional Record 4

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E148Chris Van Hollen D-MDFeb 2, 2015
HouseDebate and remarks H484Virginia Foxx R-NCJan 22, 2015
HouseDebate and remarks H443–H453, H453–H460Text printed H443, H453Amendments H451Motions H458Recorded votes H452, H459consideration (H. Res. 38), previous questionPallone motion to recommit (ensure taxpayers are not held liable and pipeline owners bear full responsibility for any repair or damages resulting from a pipeline explosion)Bruce Poliquin R-ME, Carolyn B. Maloney D-NY, Ed Whitfield R-KY, Frank Pallone, Jr. D-NJ (motion), Fred Upton R-MI, Gene Green D-TX, James P. McGovern D-MA (amendment), John P. Sarbanes D-MD, Mike Pompeo R-KS, Niki Tsongas D-MA, Pete Aguilar D-CA, Richard L. Hanna R-NY, Theodore E. Deutch D-FL, Virginia Foxx R-NCJan 21, 2015
HouseDeclaratory Statements H432—Jan 20, 2015

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Constitutional authority

Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: Article I, Section 8, Clause 3

The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 161, no. 1, January 6, 2015, page H48.

Printed hearings 2

Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.

NumberHearingCommitteeHeld
Serial No. 114-40DISCUSSION DRAFTS ADDRESSING HYDROPOWER REGULATORY MODERNIZATION AND FERC PROCESS COORDINATION UNDER THE NATURAL GAS ACT180 pagesEnergy and Commerce CommitteeMay 13, 2015
Serial No. 114-3HOW THE CHANGING ENERGY MARKETS WILL AFFECT U.S. TRANSPORTATION154 pagesTransportation and Infrastructure CommitteeFeb 3, 2015

CRS reports 4

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 4

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Titles 3

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To provide for the timely consideration of all licenses, permits, and approvals required under Federal law with respect to the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of any natural gas pipeline projects.
Short Titles as Introduced
Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act
Short Titles as Passed House
Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Energy.

Text 3

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jan 22, 2015Received in Senate
  2. Jan 21, 2015Engrossed in House
  3. Jan 6, 2015Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.