Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015
Latest action · Jul 24, 2015 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMar 25, 2015
- Passed HouseJul 23, 2015
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015
TITLE I--FOOD SAFETY AFFIRMATION FOR CERTAIN PLANT PRODUCTS
Subtitle A--Food and Drug Administration
(Sec. 101) This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to continue the voluntary consultation process established under the FDA’s "Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties." In that process, the FDA evaluates a scientific and regulatory assessment provided by the developer of a food produced from, containing, or consisting of a plant that is a genetically engineered organism (GMO).
The FDA may require a GMO food to have a label that informs consumers of a material difference between the GMO food and a comparable food if the disclosure is necessary to protect public health and safety or to prevent the label from being false or misleading. The use of a GMO does not, by itself, constitute a material difference.
Subtitle B--Department of Agriculture
(Sec. 111) This bill amends the Plant Protection Act to allow the sale of a GMO food (including imported food and excluding plant pests) only if the FDA has determined through the consultation process that the GMO food is safe and lawful and that determination has been shared with the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The FDA and USDA must report on implementation of this process. A GMO plant may be sold for research, to produce a processing aid or enzyme, or as a nutrient source for microorganisms without meeting these requirements.
USDA must publish a list of GMO plants that can be sold as food and the determinations made by the FDA and USDA regarding those foods.
(Sec. 113) State and local requirements for GMO food are preempted by this Act.
TITLE II--GENETIC ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
(Sec. 201) This bill amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to establish a voluntary genetically engineered food certification program. This program must be implemented through certifying agents accredited by the AMS.
For a food to be sold as a product produced without genetic engineering (non-GMO), the food must be subject to supply chain process controls that keep the product separated from GMOs and must be produced and handled in compliance with a non-genetically engineered food plan, which is a description of procedures to ensure compliance, monitoring records, and corrective actions in the event of a deviation from the plan.
For food derived from livestock to be sold as non-GMO, the product, livestock, feed, and products used in processing the feed must be produced without GMOs.
A food’s label or advertising cannot suggest that non-GMO foods are safer or of higher quality than GMO foods.
For a food to be sold as a GMO food, it must be produced and handled in compliance with a genetically engineered food plan. A GMO food’s label or advertising cannot suggest that it is safer or of higher quality solely because it is GMO.
The AMS must allow a person to voluntarily disclose how a product has been genetically engineered.
Imported products may be labeled as produced with or without genetic engineering if the products have been produced and handled under a genetic engineering certification program that provides safeguards and guidelines at least equivalent to the AMS’s requirements.
(Sec. 203) State and local requirements for the labeling of GMO products are preempted unless the state or local government establishes a program that matches the programs described in this Act.
(Sec. 204) Claims made before enactment of this Act regarding whether a product was produced with or without genetic engineering may continue to be made for 36 months after enactment of this Act. After that period, the claims must meet the standards in this Act. Products from certified organic producers are deemed to be certified non-GMO.
TITLE III--NATURAL FOODS
(Sec. 302) The FDA must regulate the term “natural” on food labeling.
(Sec. 303) State and local requirements for the term “natural” are preempted by FDA regulations.Recorded votes 5
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 463 | On agreeing to the Polis of Colorado Amendment to the title | Failed87–337 | Jul 23, 2015 |
| House 462 | On Passage | Passed275–150 | Jul 23, 2015 |
| House 461 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed163–262 | Jul 23, 2015 |
| House 460 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed196–227 | Jul 23, 2015 |
| House 459 | On Agreeing to the Amendment | Failed123–303 | Jul 23, 2015 |
Cosponsors 106
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 25, 2015 to Jul 16, 2015, with 17 there on the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-FL | Alcee L. Hastings | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-NC | Alma S. Adams | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-AZ | Ann Kirkpatrick | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-MO | Ann Wagner | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-NE | Brad Ashford | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-NY | Chris Collins | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-WA | Dan Newhouse | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-CA | David G. Valadao | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-GA | David Scott | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-CA | Devin Nunes | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-KY | Ed Whitfield | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-NC | G. K. Butterfield | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-ND | Kevin Cramer | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| D-OR | Kurt Schrader | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
| R-NC | Renee L. Ellmers | Original | Mar 25, 2015 |
Actions 30
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jul 24, 2015Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- Jul 23, 2015Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 369. (consideration: CR H5416-5439)
- Jul 23, 2015DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeLauro amendment No. 3.
- Jul 23, 2015DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Huffman amendment No. 2.
- Jul 23, 2015DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pingree amendment No. 4.
Amendments 5
Amendments offered to this bill.
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRES 369 | Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1599) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to food produced from, containing, or consisting of a bioengineered organism, the labeling of natural foods, and for other purposes, and pro | Related bill | Jul 22, 2015 |
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Agriculture and Food.
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures
- Agricultural practices and innovations
- Agriculture and Food
- Business records
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Federal preemption
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- Food supply, safety, and labeling
- Fruit and vegetables
- Genetics
- Marketing and advertising
Text 4
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Jul 24, 2015Referred in Senate
- Jul 23, 2015Engrossed in House
- Jul 16, 2015Reported in House
- Mar 25, 2015Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.