Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw and refined sugar.
Latest action · Oct 12, 2013 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Progress
Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.
- IntroducedOct 11, 2013
- Agreed to in HouseNot reached
Summary
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the House managers of the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill H.R. 2642 (Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013) should advance provisions to repeal the Administration of Tariff Rate Quotas language as added by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, and thus restore the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture (USDA) to manage sugar supplies to meet domestic demand at reasonable prices.
Recorded votes 1
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 545 | On Agreeing to the Resolution | Failed192–212 | Oct 12, 2013 |
Cosponsors 3
Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Oct 11, 2013.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-VA | Bob Goodlatte | Original | Oct 11, 2013 |
| D-IL | Danny K. Davis | Original | Oct 11, 2013 |
| D-OR | Earl Blumenauer | Original | Oct 11, 2013 |
Committees 2
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Agriculture Committee | Referred Oct 11, 2013 |
| House | Ways and Means Committee | Referred Oct 11, 2013 |
Actions 9
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Oct 12, 2013Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6556)
- Oct 12, 2013Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 192 - 212, 1 Present (Roll no. 545).
- Oct 12, 2013Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Oct 11, 2013Introduced in House
- Oct 11, 2013Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Oct 11, 2013Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 380. (consideration: CR H6520-6527; text of measure as introduced: CR H6520)
- Oct 11, 2013DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 378.
- Oct 11, 2013The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H6520)
- Oct 11, 2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 378, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Peterson demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing the resolution until a time to be announced.
In the Congressional Record 2
Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Recorded votes H6556 | — | Oct 12, 2013 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6505–H6514, H6520–H6527Text printed H6505, H6520Amendments H6512Recorded votes H6513, H6514call on conferees to restore Dept. of Agriculture authority to manage sugar supplies throughout the year (H. Res. 378), consideration (H. Res. 380)—previous question | Betty McCollum D-MN, Bob Goodlatte R-VA, Bradley Scott Schneider D-IL, Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann R-TN, Charles W. Dent R-PA, Collin C. Peterson D-MN, Daniel T. Kildee D-MI, Danny K. Davis D-IL, Derek Kilmer D-WA, Doug Collins R-GA, Earl Blumenauer D-OR, Gregory W. Meeks D-NY, Jackie Speier D-CA, James P. McGovern D-MA (amendment), James P. Moran D-VA, Joseph R. Pitts R-PA, K. Michael Conaway R-TX, Kevin Cramer R-ND, Kurt Schrader D-OR, Mario Diaz-Balart R-FL, Marlin A. Stutzman R-IN, Richard M. Nolan D-MN, Robert E. Latta R-OH, Ted Poe R-TX, Ted S. Yoho R-FL, Virginia Foxx R-NC | Oct 11, 2013 |
Research
What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
CRS reports 1
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this resolution or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 1
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R42551 | Sugar Provisions of the 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79) Archived | Report | Mar 21, 2014 |
Related bills 2
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
Titles 1
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw and refined sugar.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Congress.
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Oct 11, 2013Committee Discharged House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.
