Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act of 2011
Latest action · Jun 16, 2011 Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJun 15, 2011
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act of 2011 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to extend the exclusivity period for a new prescription drug by five years for a drug that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines to be a qualified infectious disease product. Defines "qualified infectious disease product" to mean an antibiotic drug for treating, detecting, preventing, or identifying a qualifying pathogen (certain pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics). Excludes drugs that are: (1) a supplement to a new drug application for which an extension is in effect or has expired; or (2) a subsequent application for a change that results in a new indication, route of administration, dosing schedule, dosage form, delivery system, delivery device or strength, or a modification to the structure of the product that does not result in a change in safety or effectiveness.
Extends such period of exclusivity an additional six months for a sponsor or manufacturer of a qualified infectious disease product that identifies a companion diagnostic test.
Requires the Secretary to give priority review to any drug determined to be a qualified infectious disease product.
Includes qualified infectious disease products as fast track products for which the Secretary shall facilitate development and expedite review.
Directs the Comptroller General to study the need for incentives to encourage the research, development, and marketing of qualified infectious disease biological products.
Requires the Secretary to: (1) review Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for clinical trials of antibiotic drugs; and (2) revise such guidelines, as appropriate, to reflect developments in scientific and medical information and technology and to ensure clarity regarding the procedures and requirements for approval of an antibiotic drug.
Cosponsors 46
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jun 15, 2011 to May 8, 2012; 6 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-CA | Anna G. Eshoo | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| D-CO | Diana DeGette | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| R-KY | Ed Whitfield | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| D-TX | Gene Green | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| R-IL | John Shimkus | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| R-MI | Mike Rogers | Original | Jun 15, 2011 |
| R-CA | Brian P. Bilbray | Jul 6, 2011 | |
| R-MS | Gregg Harper | Jul 7, 2011 | |
| R-TN | Marsha Blackburn | Jul 8, 2011 | |
| R-NJ | Leonard Lance | Jul 12, 2011 | |
| R-NC | Sue Wilkins Myrick | Jul 15, 2011 | |
| R-OK | John Sullivan | Jul 20, 2011 | |
| R-TX | Michael C. Burgess | Jul 21, 2011 | |
| R-OH | Robert E. Latta | Jul 26, 2011 | |
| R-VA | H. Morgan Griffith | Jul 28, 2011 | |
| D-PA | Robert A. Brady | Sep 23, 2011 | |
| D-CT | Christopher Murphy | Oct 3, 2011 | |
| D-MA | Edward J. Markey | Oct 12, 2011 | |
| D-MA | William R. Keating | Oct 13, 2011 | |
| D-WA | Jay Inslee | Oct 25, 2011 | |
| D-DE | John C. Carney, Jr. | Oct 25, 2011 | |
| R-PA | Patrick Meehan | Oct 25, 2011 | |
| D-NC | Brad Miller | Oct 31, 2011 | |
| R-KY | Brett Guthrie | Nov 10, 2011 | |
| R-IN | Dan Burton | Nov 10, 2011 | |
| D-NC | G. K. Butterfield | Nov 10, 2011 | |
| R-LA | Bill Cassidy | Nov 16, 2011 | |
| R-TX | Michael T. McCaul | Nov 16, 2011 | |
| R-AL | Mo Brooks | Nov 30, 2011 | |
| R-GA | Paul C. Broun | Dec 2, 2011 | |
| R-WA | Cathy McMorris Rodgers | Dec 13, 2011 | |
| D-CT | James A. Himes | Dec 15, 2011 | |
| R-OR | Greg Walden | Dec 19, 2011 | |
| R-NC | Patrick T. McHenry | Dec 19, 2011 | |
| D-MA | Niki Tsongas | Feb 2, 2012 | |
| D-UT | Jim Matheson | Feb 7, 2012 | |
| D-TX | Charles A. Gonzalez | Feb 15, 2012 | |
| D-CA | Doris O. Matsui | Feb 29, 2012 | |
| R-IA | Tom Latham | Mar 5, 2012 | |
| D-CA | Bob Filner | Apr 17, 2012 | |
| R-CA | Gary G. Miller | Apr 17, 2012 | |
| D-GA | John Barrow | Apr 17, 2012 | |
| R-IL | Adam Kinzinger | Apr 24, 2012 | |
| R-MI | Dan Benishek | Apr 27, 2012 | |
| D-AR | Mike Ross | May 7, 2012 | |
| D-VI | Donna M. Christensen | May 8, 2012 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Energy and Commerce Committee | Referred Jun 15, 2011 |
| Health Subcommittee | Referred Jun 16, 2011 |
Actions 3
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jun 16, 2011Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
- Jun 15, 2011Introduced in House
- Jun 15, 2011Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In the Congressional Record 2
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senate | Debate and remarks S7028–S7030 | Bob Corker R-TN, Richard Blumenthal D-CT | Nov 2, 2011 |
| House | Lists H4278H.R. 2182-2203 | — | Jun 15, 2011 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H4278.
Printed hearings 3
Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.
| Number | Hearing | Committee | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serial No. 112-126 | FDA USER FEES 2012: ISSUES RELATED TO ACCELERATED APPROVAL, MEDICAL GAS, ANTIBIOTIC DEVELOPMENT, AND DOWNSTREAM PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY CHAIN218 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Mar 8, 2012 |
| Serial No. 112-110 | REAUTHORIZATION OF PDUFA: WHAT IT MEANS FOR JOBS, INNOVATION, AND PATIENTS261 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Feb 1, 2012 |
| Serial No. 112-70 | PDUFA V: MEDICAL INNOVATION, JOBS, AND PATIENTS169 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Jul 7, 2011 |
CRS reports 2
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 2
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R42680 | The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA, P.L. 112-144) Archived | Report | Feb 4, 2013 |
| R42564 | FDA User Fees and the Regulation of Drugs, Biologics, and Devices: Comparative Analysis of S. 3187 and H.R. 5651 Archived | Report | Jun 26, 2012 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 1734 | Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act of 2011 | Identical bill | Oct 19, 2011 |
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To provide incentives for the development of qualified infectious disease products.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act of 2011
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Health.
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Drug safety, medical device, and laboratory regulation
- Government studies and investigations
- Health
- Infectious and parasitic diseases
- Intellectual property
- Medical research
- Medical tests and diagnostic methods
- Prescription drugs
- Research and development
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Jun 15, 2011Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.