Free Sugar Act of 2011
Latest action · May 11, 2011 Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMay 5, 2011
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Free Sugar Act of 2011 - Amends the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 to repeal the sugar loan program.
Cosponsors 24
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from May 5, 2011 to Jul 10, 2012; 2 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-OR | Earl Blumenauer | Original | May 5, 2011 |
| D-VA | James P. Moran | Original | May 5, 2011 |
| D-IL | Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. | May 23, 2011 | |
| R-AZ | Jeff Flake | Jun 3, 2011 | |
| R-NJ | Leonard Lance | Jun 3, 2011 | |
| R-TX | Jeb Hensarling | Jun 13, 2011 | |
| R-WI | Thomas E. Petri | Jun 22, 2011 | |
| R-NY | Richard L. Hanna | Aug 19, 2011 | |
| D-CA | John Garamendi | Sep 7, 2011 | |
| D-CA | Jackie Speier | Sep 22, 2011 | |
| D-IN | Peter J. Visclosky | Sep 29, 2011 | |
| R-NH | Charles F. Bass | Oct 3, 2011 | |
| R-AR | Steve Womack | Oct 25, 2011 | |
| R-IL | Donald A. Manzullo | Nov 3, 2011 | |
| D-IL | Mike Quigley | Dec 14, 2011 | |
| R-NJ | Rodney P. Frelinghuysen | Dec 20, 2011 | |
| R-OH | Steve Chabot | Jan 25, 2012 | |
| R-CA | Dana Rohrabacher | Feb 1, 2012 | |
| D-WA | Adam Smith | Feb 2, 2012 | |
| R-NJ | Frank A. LoBiondo | Feb 6, 2012 | |
| R-PA | Lou Barletta | Mar 21, 2012 | |
| R-IN | Larry Bucshon | Mar 22, 2012 | |
| R-IL | Joe Walsh | Mar 27, 2012 | |
| D-IL | Bobby L. Rush | Jul 10, 2012 |
Committees 2
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Agriculture Committee | Referred May 5, 2011 |
| General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit Subcommittee | Referred May 11, 2011 | |
| House | Ways and Means Committee | Referred May 5, 2011 |
| Trade Subcommittee | Referred May 11, 2011 |
Actions 4
Everything that happened, newest first.
- May 11, 2011Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management.
- May 11, 2011Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
- May 5, 2011Introduced in House
- May 5, 2011Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Debate and remarks H5032 | Robert J. Dold R-IL | Jul 14, 2011 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H3109.
Related bills 3
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 685 | Free Sugar Act of 2011 | Identical bill | Mar 30, 2011 |
| S 1658 | REFRESH Act of 2011 | Related bill | Oct 5, 2011 |
| HR 3111 | REFRESH Act of 2011 | Related bill | Oct 5, 2011 |
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To repeal the Federal sugar program.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Free Sugar Act of 2011
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Agriculture and Food.
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- May 5, 2011Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.