Broad-Based Stock Option Plan Transparency Act of 2003
Latest action · Mar 31, 2003 Referred to the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMar 20, 2003
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Broad-Based Stock Option Plan Transparency Act of 2003 - Directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to require companies to include within certain mandatory reports details regarding stock option plans, stock purchase plans, and other arrangements involving employee acquisition of an equity interest in the company, including: (1) a discussion of the dilutive effect of stock option plans (written in accordance with the Plain English Handbook published by the Office of Investor Education and Assistance of the Commission); (2) expanded disclosure of the dilutive effect of employee stock options on the company's earnings per share number; (3) prominent placement and increased comparability of all stock option related information; and (4) a summary of stock options granted to the five most highly compensated executive officers, including outstanding stock options of those officers.
Directs the SEC to examine and report to specified congressional committees on the effectiveness of the enhanced disclosures required by this Act in increasing transparency to current and potential investors.
Prohibits the Commission, between enactment of this Act and submission of such report, from recognizing as generally accepted accounting principles any new accounting standards regarding the treatment of stock options.
Directs the Secretary of Commerce to analyze and report to specified congressional committees on broad-based employee stock option plans, particularly in the high technology and any other high growth industries.
Cosponsors 111
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 20, 2003 to Mar 3, 2004, with 17 there on the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-WA | Adam Smith | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-NY | Amo Houghton | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-CA | Anna G. Eshoo | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-VA | Bob Goodlatte | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-ID | C. L. (Butch) Otter | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-CA | Calvin M. Dooley | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-CA | Christopher Cox | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-CA | Doug Ose | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-MI | Fred Upton | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-CA | Jane Harman | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-TX | Lamar Smith | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-CA | Michael M. Honda | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-NC | Mike McIntyre | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| D-CA | Mike Thompson | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
| R-TX | Pete Sessions | Original | Mar 20, 2003 |
Actions 3
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Mar 31, 2003Referred to the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
- Mar 20, 2003Introduced in House
- Mar 20, 2003Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector.
- Accounting
- Commerce
- Congress
- Congressional reporting requirements
- Earnings
- Economic impact statements
- Economics and Public Finance
- Employee motivation
- Employee ownership
- Employee stock options
- Executive compensation
- Finance and Financial Sector
- Financial statements
- Foreign Trade and International Finance
- Government Operations and Politics
- High technology
- Independent regulatory commissions
- Industrial research
- Information disclosure (Securities law)
- International competitiveness
- Investors
- Labor and Employment
- Product development
- Recruiting of employees
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Skilled labor
- Standards
- Technological innovations
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.