To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the "PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building".
Latest action · Dec 27, 2022 Became Public Law No: 117-298.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedFeb 7, 2022
- Passed HouseDec 14, 2022
- Passed SenateDec 19, 2022
- To the PresidentDec 23, 2022
- Became lawDec 27, 2022Public Law 117-298
Summary
This act designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building.
Cosponsors 52
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 2, 2022 to Sep 2, 2022.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-CA | Doug LaMalfa | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| D-CA | J. Luis Correa | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jerry McNerney | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Josh Harder | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Ken Calvert | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Michelle Steel | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Mike Thompson | Mar 2, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Darrell Issa | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| R-CA | David G. Valadao | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Jay Obernolte | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jimmy Gomez | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Lucille Roybal-Allard | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Mike Garcia | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Sara Jacobs | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Tom McClintock | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Tony Cárdenas | Mar 7, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Brad Sherman | Mar 16, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Julia Brownley | Mar 16, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Linda T. Sánchez | Mar 16, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Alan S. Lowenthal | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Anna G. Eshoo | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Doris O. Matsui | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Eric Swalwell | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jared Huffman | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jim Costa | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jimmy Panetta | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Juan Vargas | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Karen Bass | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Katie Porter | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Mark Takano | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Nanette Diaz Barragán | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Norma J. Torres | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Raul Ruiz | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Scott H. Peters | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Ami Bera | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Grace F. Napolitano | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Jackie Speier | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Judy Chu | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Mark DeSaulnier | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Mike Levin | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Ro Khanna | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Salud O. Carbajal | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Ted Lieu | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Zoe Lofgren | Mar 28, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Adam B. Schiff | Apr 6, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Barbara Lee | Apr 6, 2022 | |
| D-CA | John Garamendi | Apr 6, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Pete Aguilar | Apr 6, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Kevin McCarthy | May 10, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Maxine Waters | Jul 28, 2022 | |
| R-CA | Connie Conway | Jul 29, 2022 | |
| D-CA | Nancy Pelosi | Sep 2, 2022 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Oversight and Government Reform Committee | Referred Feb 7, 2022Markup Sep 20, 2022Markup Nov 17, 2022 |
Actions 18
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Dec 27, 2022Signed by President.
- Dec 27, 2022Became Public Law No: 117-298.
- Dec 23, 2022Presented to President.
- Dec 20, 2022Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Dec 19, 2022Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7282-7283)
In the Congressional Record 5
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senate | Debate and remarks S7282, S7283 | Brian Schatz D-HI | Dec 19, 2022 |
| House | Debate and remarks H9803Text printed H9805 | Steny H. Hoyer D-MD | Dec 14, 2022 |
| House | Debate and remarks H9695 | Young Kim R-CA | Dec 13, 2022 |
| House | Debate and remarks H9672Text printed H9672 | Carolyn B. Maloney D-NY, Yvette Herrell R-NM | Dec 12, 2022 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E38 | — | Jan 14, 2022 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Congressional Budget Office cost estimate
- Oct 5, 2022H.R. 6630, Legislation to Name United States Post OfficesAs ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform on September 20, 2022
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 168, no. 24, February 7, 2022, page H1013.
CRS reports 2
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 2
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R47170 | Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) FY2023 Appropriations: Overview | Report | Sep 29, 2023 |
| R47745 | Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) FY2023 Appropriations: Independent Agencies and General Provisions | Report | Sep 29, 2023 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
Titles 1
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the "PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building".
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
Text 4
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- —Enrolled Bill
- Dec 15, 2022Received in Senate
- Dec 14, 2022Engrossed in House
- Feb 7, 2022Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.