HR 660 · 115th Congress 2017–2019, ended

Bureau of Reclamation Transparency Act

Latest action · Sep 17, 2018 Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 573.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 24, 2017
  2. Passed HouseSep 12, 2018
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Bureau of Reclamation Transparency Act

(Sec. 4) This bill directs the Department of the Interior to submit to Congress, make publicly available, and biennially update an Asset Management Report that describes the Bureau of Reclamation's efforts to maintain in a reliable manner all reserved works (buildings, structures, facilities, or equipment owned by Reclamation for which operations and maintenance are performed by its employees or through a contract with Reclamation) at Reclamation facilities, and to standardize and streamline data reporting and processes across regions and areas for the purpose of maintaining such works.

Such report shall include: (1) a detailed assessment of major repair and rehabilitation needs for all such works; and (2) an itemized list of major repair and rehabilitation needs of individual Reclamation facilities at each Reclamation project, including a budget level cost estimate of appropriations needed to complete each item and an assignment of a categorical rating for each item consistent with existing uniform categorization systems to inform the annual budget process and agency requirements.

(Sec. 5) Interior shall: (1) coordinate with the nonfederal entities responsible for the operation and maintenance of transferred works (Reclamation facilities at which operations and maintenance are carried out by a nonfederal entity under a formal agreement with Reclamation) in developing reporting requirements for Asset Management Reports with respect to major repair and rehabilitation needs for such works, and (2) develop and implement a categorical rating system for transferred works.

(Sec. 6) The bill reduces the maximum amount of the federal share of the cost of the Central Valley Water Recycling Project otherwise available as of the date of enactment of this bill by $2 million.

Cosponsors 20

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 24, 2017 to Mar 1, 2017; 17 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-AZAndy BiggsOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-TXBlake FarentholdOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-WADan NewhouseOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-TNDiane BlackOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-CADoug LaMalfaOriginalJan 24, 2017
D-CAJared HuffmanOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-CAJeff DenhamOriginalJan 24, 2017
D-CAJim CostaOriginalJan 24, 2017
D-CAJohn GaramendiOriginalJan 24, 2017
I-AZKyrsten SinemaOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-TXLouie GohmertOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-NVMark E. AmodeiOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-AZMartha McSallyOriginalJan 24, 2017
D-PAMatt CartwrightOriginalJan 24, 2017
R-COScott R. TiptonOriginalJan 24, 2017

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseNatural Resources Committee
Referred Jan 24, 2017Markup Apr 27, 2017Reported Jun 2, 2017
Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee
Referred Feb 10, 2017Discharged Apr 27, 2017

Actions 14

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Sep 17, 2018Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 573.
  2. Sep 12, 2018Mr. Gianforte moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  3. Sep 12, 2018Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8142-8144)
  4. Sep 12, 2018DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 660.
  5. Sep 12, 2018Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8142-8143)
  6. Sep 12, 2018Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  7. Jun 2, 2017Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-156.
  8. Jun 2, 2017Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 103.
  9. Apr 27, 2017Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans Discharged.
  10. Apr 27, 2017Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
  11. Apr 27, 2017Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  12. Feb 10, 2017Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans.
  13. Jan 24, 2017Introduced in House
  14. Jan 24, 2017Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H8142–H8144Text printed H8142Greg Gianforte R-MT, Niki Tsongas D-MA, Paul A. Gosar R-AZSep 12, 2018

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Committee report

Congressional Budget Office cost estimate

  1. May 10, 2017H.R. 660, Bureau of Reclamation Transparency ActAs ordered reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources on April 27, 2017

Constitutional authority

Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 (the Spending Clause). The Supreme Court, in South Dakota v. Dole (1987), reasoned that conditions and limitations on funds were constitutional and within the power of Congress under the Spending Clause. Article 1 Section 8 Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) If the matter in question is not a purely local matter (intra-state) or if it has an impact on inter-state commerce, it falls within Congress' power to ``regulate commerce among the several states.'' Article 1 Section 8 Clause 18 (the Necessary and Proper Clause) which grants Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 163, no. 13, January 24, 2017, page H688.

CRS reports 1

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 1

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

ProductTitleKindPublished
R45492Water Resource Issues in the 116th Congress ArchivedReportFeb 7, 2019

Related bills 3

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 216Bureau of Reclamation Transparency ActIdentical billJun 8, 2017
HR 1107Bureau of Reclamation Transparency ActReintroduction ofDec 3, 2015
S 2563Water Supply Infrastructure and Drought Resilience Act of 2018Related billMar 22, 2018

Titles 4

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To require the Secretary of the Interior to submit to Congress a report on the efforts of the Bureau of Reclamation to manage its infrastructure assets.
Short Titles as Introduced
Bureau of Reclamation Transparency Act
Short Titles as Reported to House
Bureau of Reclamation Transparency Act
Short Titles as Passed House
Bureau of Reclamation Transparency Act

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Water Resources Development.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Sep 17, 2018Placed on Calendar Senate
  2. Sep 12, 2018Engrossed in House
  3. Jun 2, 2017Reported in House
  4. Jan 24, 2017Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.