HR 1431 · 115th Congress 2017–2019, ended

EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2017

Fact sheet

Latest action · Mar 30, 2017 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMar 8, 2017
  2. Passed HouseMar 30, 2017
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on March 27, 2017. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2017

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to revise the process of selecting members of the Science Advisory Board, guidelines for participation in board advisory activities, and terms of office. The board provides scientific advice to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This bill requires the board to independently provide that advice.

Among the revisions to requirements concerning the board's membership are the following:

  • a requirement to balance scientific and technical points of view;
  • a set minimum level of representation from state, local, or tribal governments;
  • allowance of affiliation with, or representation of, entities that may have a potential interest in the board's advisory activities;
  • conflict of interest restrictions;
  • restrictions on participation in advisory activities involving review of a member's work;
  • a prohibition on appointment of registered lobbyists; and
  • prohibitions on member receipt of current EPA grants or contracts.

The EPA must make public a list of nominees to the board and accept public comments on the nominees. Reports filed upon the provisional nomination of a member disclosing financial relationships and interests must also be made public.

The EPA must provide draft risk or hazard assessments in its regulatory proposals and documents to the board. The board's advice and comments must be included in the record regarding any such proposal and published in the Federal Register.

The board's member committees and investigative panels must operate in accordance with the membership, participation, and policy requirements contained in this bill, including new requirements for public participation in advisory activities of the board. The member committees and investigative panels do not have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the board and may not report directly to the EPA.

The bill imposes additional public participation requirements, including:

  • The EPA and the board must make public all reports and relevant scientific information at the same time they are received by the board;
  • The board must hold public information-gathering sessions to discuss the state of the science related to a major advisory activity;
  • Prior to convening a member committee or investigative panel, the EPA must accept and address public comments on questions asked of the board, and
  • The board, member committees, and investigative panels may not accept a question that unduly narrows the scope of an advisory activity.

In carrying out its advisory activities, the board must: (1) strive to avoid making policy determinations or recommendations, (2) communicate uncertainties associated with the scientific advice provided to the EPA or Congress, (3) encourage dissenting members to make their views known, (4) conduct periodic reviews to ensure that its activities address the most important scientific issues affecting the EPA, and (5) respond to Congress fully and in a timely manner.

(Sec. 3) This bill shall not be construed as supplanting the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act or the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.

Recorded votes 2

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 208Passed229–193Mar 30, 2017
House 207Failed189–233Mar 30, 2017

Cosponsors 28

Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Mar 8, 2017.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-AZAndy BiggsOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-FLBill PoseyOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-TXBlake FarentholdOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-VABob GoodlatteOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-TXBrian BabinOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-LAClay HigginsOriginalMar 8, 2017
D-MNCollin C. PetersonOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-CADana RohrabacherOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-FLDaniel WebsterOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-ILDarin LaHoodOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-AZDavid SchweikertOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-AKDon YoungOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-UTJason ChaffetzOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-INJim BanksOriginalMar 8, 2017
R-OKJim BridenstineOriginalMar 8, 2017

Actions 20

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Mar 30, 2017Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 233. (consideration: CR H2564-2576)
  2. Mar 30, 2017DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1431.
  3. Mar 30, 2017Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Foster motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the same back to the House forthwith with an amendment to prohibit members of the Science Advisory Board from being employed by any corporate entity that has an interest before the Board during that members service, and for three years following that members service.
  4. Mar 30, 2017Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  5. Mar 30, 2017Mr. Foster moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. (text: CR H2573-2574)

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Environmental Protection.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Mar 30, 2017Referred in Senate
  2. Mar 30, 2017Engrossed in House
  3. Mar 27, 2017Reported in House
  4. Mar 8, 2017Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.