HR 24 · 110th Congress 2007–2009, ended

San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act

Latest action · Mar 1, 2007 Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 4, 2007
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to implement the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement dated September 13, 2006, in Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. Kirk Rodgers, et al., in cooperation with the state of California, including measures to: (1) design and construct channel and structural improvements; (2) modify Friant Dam operations to provide Restoration Flows and Interim Flows; (3) acquire water, water rights, or options to acquire water from willing sellers; (4) implement terms and conditions related to recirculation, recapture, reuse, exchange, or transfer of water released for such flows; and (5) develop and implement the Recovered Water Account.

Directs the Secretary to: (1) enter into agreements with California to facilitate or expedite Settlement implementation; and (2) identify impacts associated with such actions and measures to mitigate impacts on adjacent and downstream water users and landowners. Provides that Settlement implementation and the reintroduction of Chinook salmon shall not result in the involuntary reduction in contract water allocations to Central Valley Project long-term contractors apart from Friant Division contractors.

Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) acquire through purchase from willing sellers property needed to implement the Settlement; and (2) dispose of such property. Requires proceeds from the disposal of such property to be deposited into the San Joaquin River Restoration Fund (established by this Act).

Declares that the Settlement satisfies and discharges the Secretary's obligations under the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992. Provides for the reintroduction of Chinook salmon into the San Joaquin River.

Cosponsors 6

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 4, 2007 to May 1, 2007; 4 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-CADennis A. CardozaOriginalJan 4, 2007
D-CAGeorge MillerOriginalJan 4, 2007
D-CAGrace F. NapolitanoOriginalJan 4, 2007
D-CAJim CostaOriginalJan 4, 2007
D-CAJoe BacaFeb 13, 2007
D-CAJerry McNerneyMay 1, 2007

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseNatural Resources Committee
Referred Jan 4, 2007
Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee
Referred Feb 7, 2007Hearings Mar 1, 2007

Actions 4

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Mar 1, 2007Subcommittee Hearings Held.
  2. Feb 7, 2007Referred to the Subcommittee on Water and Power.
  3. Jan 4, 2007Introduced in House
  4. Jan 4, 2007Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 2

  1. Apr 18, 2007H.R. 24, San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act<p>Cost estimate for the bill as introduced on January 4, 2007</p>
  2. Apr 18, 2007H.R. 24, San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement ActCost estimate for the bill as introduced on January 4, 2007

Printed hearings 6

Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.

NumberHearingCommitteeHeld
Serial No. 110-35H.R. 2515, ``LOWER COLORADO RIVER MULTI-SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM ACT'' & H.R. 1970, ``NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER PROJECTS ACT''109 pagesNatural Resources CommitteeJul 24, 2007
S. Hrg. 110-148NAVAJO NATION'S WATER RIGHTS AND MISCELLANEOUS WATER SUPPLY ISSUES120 pagesEnergy and Natural Resources CommitteeJun 27, 2007
S. Hrg. 110-93SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION SETTLEMENT ACT80 pagesEnergy and Natural Resources CommitteeMay 3, 2007
—ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008113 pagesAppropriations CommitteeMar 15, 2007
S. Hrg. 110-442ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008593 pagesAppropriations CommitteeMar 7, 2007–Apr 18, 2007

CRS reports 2

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 2

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

ProductTitleKindPublished
R44889H.R. 23, the Gaining Responsibility on Water Act of 2017 (GROW Act)ReportJul 11, 2017
R43648H.R. 3964: Analysis of Key Provisions ArchivedReportJul 17, 2014

Related bills 3

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 27San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement ActText similaritiesJun 25, 2008
HR 3768San Joaquin River Settlement Water Management Goal Implementation ActText similaritiesOct 11, 2007
HR 4074San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement ActRelated billMay 13, 2008

Titles 2

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To authorize the implementation of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement.
Short Titles as Introduced
San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Water Resources Development.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jan 4, 2007Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.