HR 5120 · 109th Congress 2005โ€“2007, ended

To amend title 35, United States Code, to conform certain filing provisions within the Patent and Trademark Office.

Latest action · Sep 14, 2006 Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedApr 6, 2006
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Allows the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to accept an application for an extension of the term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a product, or a method of manufacturing a product if: (1) such application is filed no more than 5 days late; and (2) the applicant files a petition showing that the delay in filing the application was unintentional. Deems such petition to be denied if no determination has been made on the petition within 30 days of filing. Establishes the fee for filing such a petition.

Applies this Act to any application for patent term extension which: (1) is pending on the date of enactment; (2) is the subject of a request for reconsideration of a denial of a patent term extension; or (3) has been denied a patent term extension in a case in which the period for seeking reconsideration of such denial has not yet expired.

Cosponsors 26

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Apr 6, 2006 to Sep 27, 2006; 3 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-MABill DelahuntOriginalApr 6, 2006
R-TNJohn J. Duncan, Jr.OriginalApr 6, 2006
D-MAMartin T. MeehanOriginalApr 6, 2006
D-MABarney FrankApr 27, 2006
R-TXPete SessionsMay 2, 2006
D-VARick BoucherMay 2, 2006
D-NJSteven R. RothmanMay 2, 2006
R-CAElton GalleglyMay 4, 2006
D-NJRobert E. AndrewsMay 4, 2006
R-ILHenry J. HydeMay 11, 2006
D-OHStephanie Tubbs JonesJun 20, 2006
R-ALSpencer BachusJun 22, 2006
D-VIDonna M. ChristensenJun 27, 2006
R-AZJeff FlakeJun 27, 2006
D-GAJohn LewisJun 27, 2006
R-TNMarsha BlackburnJun 29, 2006
R-WADavid G. ReichertJul 10, 2006
D-SCJames E. ClyburnJul 18, 2006
D-NJDonald M. PayneJul 20, 2006
R-UTChris CannonSep 6, 2006
R-TXJeb HensarlingSep 6, 2006
R-WADoc HastingsSep 14, 2006
D-MIJohn Conyers, Jr.Sep 20, 2006
R-TXLouie GohmertSep 20, 2006
R-INMike PenceSep 26, 2006
R-FLTom FeeneySep 27, 2006

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Apr 6, 2006
Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee
Referred Jun 5, 2006Hearings Sep 14, 2006

Actions 4

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Sep 14, 2006Subcommittee Hearings Held.
  2. Jun 5, 2006Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
  3. Apr 6, 2006Introduced in House
  4. Apr 6, 2006Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Printed hearings 1

Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.

NumberHearingCommitteeHeld
Serial No. 109-150A BILL TO AMEND TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE, TO CONFORM CERTAIN FILING PROVISIONS WITHIN THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE92 pagesJudiciary CommitteeSep 14, 2006

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To amend title 35, United States Code, to conform certain filing provisions within the Patent and Trademark Office.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Commerce.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Apr 6, 2006Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.