Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2005
Latest action · Mar 1, 2005 Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMar 1, 2005
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2005 - Modifies Federal postal law to revise requirements for the closing or consolidation of a post office and apply them, as well, to its proposed closing, consolidation, relocation, or construction. Requires a 60-day notice, under certain conditions, to persons (including local government officials) who are (or would be) served by the post office involved to allow such individuals an opportunity to present their views before such proposed action. Requires the notice: (1) by the deadline, to be hand delivered or delivered by mail and published once a week for at least four weeks in one or more newspapers regularly issued and of general circulation within the zip code areas which are (or would be) served by the post office involved; and (2) to include a description of the proposed action, a summary of the reasons for it, and the date on which the action is to be taken (or, in the case of the construction of a post office, the proposed timetable).
Revises the factors to be considered in deciding whether or not to take such proposed actions.
Requires the Postal Service to follow a community's public participation procedures to address the relocation, closing, consolidation, or construction of buildings in the community if such procedures are more stringent than those provided in this Act.
Cosponsors 39
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 1, 2005 to Apr 5, 2005; 35 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-CA | Adam B. Schiff | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Anna G. Eshoo | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-MA | Barney Frank | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-WA | Brian Baird | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Carolyn McCarthy | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Charles B. Rangel | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Dennis A. Cardoza | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-OH | Dennis J. Kucinich | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Diane E. Watson | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| R-IL | Donald A. Manzullo | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-MA | Edward J. Markey | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-MD | Elijah E. Cummings | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | George Miller | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Howard L. Berman | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-VA | James P. Moran | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-MI | John Conyers, Jr. | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-SC | John M. Spratt, Jr. | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-PA | John P. Murtha | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| R-IL | John Shimkus | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Jose E. Serrano | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-IN | Julia Carson | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-IL | Lane Evans | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Lynn C. Woolsey | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Major R. Owens | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-ME | Michael H. Michaud | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Michael R. McNulty | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NY | Nita M. Lowey | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| R-PA | Phil English | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Sam Farr | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| R-NY | Sue W. Kelly | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-WI | Tammy Baldwin | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-ME | Thomas H. Allen | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-PA | Tim Holden | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-NM | Tom Udall | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| R-VA | Virgil H. Goode Jr. | Original | Mar 1, 2005 |
| D-CA | Barbara Lee | Mar 2, 2005 | |
| D-IL | Daniel Lipinski | Mar 3, 2005 | |
| R-PR | Luis G. Fortuno | Mar 8, 2005 | |
| D-CA | Henry A. Waxman | Apr 5, 2005 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Oversight and Government Reform Committee | Referred Mar 1, 2005 |
Actions 3
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Mar 1, 2005Introduced in House
- Mar 1, 2005Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E322-323)
- Mar 1, 2005Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E322 | Earl Blumenauer D-OR | Mar 1, 2005 |
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures relating to the closing or consolidation of a post office be extended to the relocation or construction of a post office, and for other purposes.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2005
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
- Administrative procedure
- Administrative remedies
- Building construction
- Building laws
- Citizen participation
- Commemorations
- Commerce
- Community development
- Executive reorganization
- Federal employees
- Federal-local relations
- Government and business
- Government Operations and Politics
- Government paperwork
- Government publicity
- Historic sites
- History
- Infrastructure
- Land use
- Law
- Local laws
- Newspapers
- Postal facilities
- Postal service
- Public Lands and Natural Resources
- Public meetings
- Relocation
- United States Postal Service
- Urban affairs
- Zoning and zoning law
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Mar 1, 2005Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.