S 625 · 107th Congress 2001–2003, ended

Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2001

Fact sheet

Latest action · Jun 11, 2002 Returned to the Calendar.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMar 27, 2001
  2. Passed SenateNot reached
  3. Passed HouseNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2001 - Authorizes the Attorney General to provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or other assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that: (1) constitutes a crime of violence under Federal law or a felony under State or Indian tribal law; and (2) is motivated by prejudice based on the race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or disability of the victim or is a violation of the hate crime laws of the State or tribe. Directs the Attorney General to give priority for assistance to crimes committed by offenders who have committed crimes in more than one State and to rural jurisdictions that have difficulty covering the extraordinary investigation or prosecution expenses.

Authorizes the Attorney General to award grants to assist State, local, and Indian law enforcement officials with such extraordinary expenses. Directs the Office of Justice Programs to: (1) work closely with funded jurisdictions to ensure that the concerns and needs of all affected parties are addressed; and (2) award grants to State and local programs designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles.

Prohibits specified offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or disability.

Directs the U.S. Sentencing Commission to study and provide sentencing enhancements for adult recruitment of juveniles to commit hate crimes.

Amends the Hate Crimes Statistics Act to require the crime data to be collected and published by the Attorney General to include data about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on gender.

Recorded votes 1

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
Senate 147Cloture Motion Rejected54–43Jun 11, 2002

Cosponsors 50

Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Mar 27, 2001.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-PAArlen SpecterOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-MDBarbara A. MikulskiOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-CABarbara BoxerOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-NEBen NelsonOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-FLBill NelsonOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-ARBlanche L. LincolnOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-FLBob GrahamOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-NDByron L. DorganOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-MICarl LevinOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-NYCharles E. SchumerOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-CTChristopher J. DoddOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-HIDaniel K. AkakaOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-HIDaniel K. InouyeOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-MIDebbie StabenowOriginalMar 27, 2001
D-CADianne FeinsteinOriginalMar 27, 2001

Actions 14

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 11, 2002Cloture on the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 43. Record Vote Number: 147.
  2. Jun 11, 2002Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S5325-5337)
  3. Jun 11, 2002Motion by Senator Daschle to reconsider the vote by which cloture was not invoked entered in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
  4. Jun 11, 2002Returned to the Calendar.
  5. Jun 10, 2002Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S5267-5276)

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
HR 1343Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2001Related billFeb 7, 2002

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement.

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.