HR 2070 · 116th Congress 2019โ€“2021, ended

POWER Act

Latest action · May 15, 2019 Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedApr 3, 2019
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Providing Officers With Electronic Resources Act or the POWER Act

This bill authorizes the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services within the Department of Justice to make grants to law enforcement agencies to purchase a chemical screening device and to train personnel to use, and interpret data collected by, such device.

Cosponsors 22

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Apr 3, 2019 to Sep 11, 2020; 2 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-MDDavid J. TroneOriginalApr 3, 2019
R-OHDavid P. JoyceOriginalApr 3, 2019
R-COScott R. TiptonApr 8, 2019
D-OHTim RyanApr 10, 2019
D-MAStephen F. LynchApr 15, 2019
R-WVAlexander X. MooneyApr 22, 2019
R-WVDavid B. McKinleyApr 25, 2019
D-CAEric SwalwellApr 29, 2019
R-PABrian K. FitzpatrickMay 1, 2019
D-MOWm. Lacy ClayMay 1, 2019
D-MDC. A. Dutch RuppersbergerMay 2, 2019
D-TNJim CooperMay 17, 2019
D-PAMadeleine DeanJun 3, 2019
D-CARo KhannaJun 10, 2019
R-PAGuy ReschenthalerSep 20, 2019
D-CAJ. Luis CorreaOct 1, 2019
R-OHSteve ChabotOct 4, 2019
R-WIBryan SteilJan 8, 2020
D-IACynthia AxneJan 13, 2020
D-NJJosh GottheimerFeb 5, 2020
D-NHAnn M. KusterMay 5, 2020
D-TXLizzie FletcherSep 11, 2020

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Apr 3, 2019
Crime and Federal Government Surveillance Subcommittee
Referred May 15, 2019

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. May 15, 2019Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
  2. Apr 3, 2019Introduced in House
  3. Apr 3, 2019Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H3914Katie Hill D-CAMay 16, 2019

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Constitutional authority

Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: Article 1, Section 8.

The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 165, no. 58, April 3, 2019, page H3069.

Related bills 3

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 954POWER ActRelated billMar 28, 2019
HR 5382POWER ActReintroduced BillNov 1, 2022
HR 5871POWER ActReintroduction ofJul 24, 2018

Titles 3

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To provide grants to State, local, territorial, and tribal law enforcement agencies to purchase chemical screening devices and train personnel to use chemical screening devices in order to enhance law enforcement efficiency and protect law enforcement officers.
Short Title(s) as Introduced
POWER Act
Providing Officers With Electronic Resources Act

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Apr 3, 2019Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.