SJRES 35 · 114th Congress 2015โ€“2017, ended

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act".

Latest action · Jun 9, 2016 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJun 9, 2016
  2. Passed SenateNot reached
  3. Passed HouseNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."

The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.

(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)

Cosponsors 25

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jun 9, 2016 to Sep 14, 2016; 1 is an original cosponsor, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-TNLamar AlexanderOriginalJun 9, 2016
R-GAJohnny IsaksonJun 15, 2016
R-AZJohn McCainJun 22, 2016
R-UTOrrin G. HatchJun 22, 2016
R-KSPat RobertsJun 23, 2016
R-ALRichard C. ShelbyJun 23, 2016
R-ALJeff SessionsJun 27, 2016
R-TNBob CorkerJun 29, 2016
R-OKJames M. InhofeJun 29, 2016
R-UTMike LeeJun 29, 2016
R-MSRoger F. WickerJun 29, 2016
R-ARTom CottonJun 29, 2016
R-LADavid VitterJul 6, 2016
R-OKJames LankfordJul 6, 2016
R-WIRon JohnsonJul 7, 2016
R-MSThad CochranJul 11, 2016
R-GADavid PerdueJul 13, 2016
R-SCLindsey GrahamJul 13, 2016
R-WYMichael B. EnziJul 14, 2016
R-KYMitch McConnellJul 14, 2016
R-LABill CassidySep 6, 2016
R-TXJohn CornynSep 6, 2016
R-SDJohn ThuneSep 6, 2016
R-SDMike RoundsSep 6, 2016
R-MESusan M. CollinsSep 14, 2016

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
SenateHealth, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Referred Jun 9, 2016

Actions 2

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 9, 2016Introduced in Senate
  2. Jun 9, 2016Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Related bills 2

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act".

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Labor and Employment.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jun 9, 2016Introduced in Senate

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.