S 2473 · 114th Congress 2015–2017, ended

Express Appeals Act of 2016

Fact sheet

Latest action · Mar 15, 2016 Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-558.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 28, 2016
  2. Passed SenateNot reached
  3. Passed HouseNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Express Appeals Act of 2016

This bill directs the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to: (1) carry out a five-year pilot program to provide the option of an alternative appeals process to determine appeals of claims for disability compensation more quickly, and (2) inform claimants about such program.

Appeals filed under the pilot program are described as "fully developed appeals."

A claimant may elect to file a fully developed appeal by filing with the VA: (1) a notice of disagreement along with the claimant's written election to have the appeal determined under the pilot program, (2) all evidence that the claimant believes is needed for the appeal, and (3) a statement of the argument in support of the claim.

A claimant who elects the pilot program may elect to revert to the standard appeals process at any time. Such reversion, however, shall be final.

Such a claimant or an electing claimant who is later determined to be ineligible for the pilot program shall revert to the standard appeals process without any penalty other than the loss of docket number.

The VA shall transfer jurisdiction over a fully developed appeal directly to the Board of Veterans' Appeals.

The Board shall:

  • maintain fully developed appeals on a separate docket;
  • hear fully developed appeals in the order received;
  • decide not more than one fully developed appeal for each four traditional appeals decided, though this ratio may be adjusted for fairness purposes beginning one year after the pilot program begins; and
  • decide each fully developed appeal within one year of a claimant's filing the notice of disagreement.

A claimant may not submit or identify to the Board any new evidence relating to a fully developed appeal after filing such appeal unless the claimant reverts to the standard appeals process.

The Board shall establish an office to develop necessary federal records, independent medical opinions, and new medical exams.

The Board may not provide hearings for fully developed appeals.

Cosponsors 9

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 28, 2016 to Apr 18, 2016, with 3 there on the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-NVDean HellerOriginalJan 28, 2016
D-MTJon TesterOriginalJan 28, 2016
D-PARobert P. Casey Jr.OriginalJan 28, 2016
R-MTSteve DainesFeb 3, 2016
R-KSJerry MoranFeb 9, 2016
D-DEChristopher A. CoonsMar 7, 2016
R-IAChuck GrassleyMar 9, 2016
D-WITammy BaldwinApr 5, 2016
R-SDMike RoundsApr 18, 2016

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Mar 15, 2016Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-558.
  2. Jan 28, 2016Introduced in Senate
  3. Jan 28, 2016Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Related bills 3

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
HR 677American Heroes COLA Act of 2015Related billFeb 10, 2016
HR 800Express Appeals ActRelated billJul 9, 2015
S 2921Veterans First ActRelated billMay 16, 2016

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jan 28, 2016Introduced in Senate

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.