HRES 359 · 114th Congress 2015–2017, ended

Providing that the House of Representatives disagrees with the majority opinion in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, and for other purposes.

Latest action · Jul 29, 2015 Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedJul 10, 2015
  2. Agreed to in HouseNot reached

Summary

Declares that the House of Representatives: (1) disagrees with the Supreme Court's majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges and its holdings that the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution requires states to license marriages between same-sex couples and requires states to recognize same-sex marriages performed out-of-state; and (2) agrees with the four dissenting opinions, which uphold the traditional definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman and the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Expresses the sense of the House that:

  • the traditional definition of marriage is a union between one man and one woman;
  • the majority opinion in Obergefell unconstitutionally and indefensibly distorts the definition of marriage;
  • states may refuse to be bound by the holding in Obergefell;
  • states are not required to license same-sex marriage or recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states; and
  •  individuals, businesses, churches, religious groups, and other faith-based organizations are encouraged, empowered, and protected to exercise their faith without fear of legal or government interference.

Cosponsors 18

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jul 10, 2015 to Jul 22, 2015; 6 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-MDAndy HarrisOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-TXBrian BabinOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-TXLouie GohmertOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-FLTed S. YohoOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-KSTim HuelskampOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-AZTrent FranksOriginalJul 10, 2015
R-NCWalter B. JonesJul 13, 2015
R-WIGlenn GrothmanJul 14, 2015
R-LARalph Lee AbrahamJul 14, 2015
R-TXJoe BartonJul 15, 2015
R-PAJoseph R. PittsJul 15, 2015
R-TXK. Michael ConawayJul 15, 2015
R-TNMarsha BlackburnJul 15, 2015
R-TXRandy K. Weber, Sr.Jul 15, 2015
R-MTRyan K. ZinkeJul 15, 2015
R-MITim WalbergJul 15, 2015
R-GARick W. AllenJul 22, 2015
R-PATim MurphyJul 22, 2015

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Jul 10, 2015
Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee
Referred Jul 29, 2015

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jul 29, 2015Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
  2. Jul 10, 2015Introduced in House
  3. Jul 10, 2015Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H5088—Jul 10, 2015

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
Providing that the House of Representatives disagrees with the majority opinion in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, and for other purposes.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jul 10, 2015Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.