Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 273) to eliminate the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for Federal employees, and for other purposes.
Latest action · Feb 14, 2013 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 192 (Roll no. 42). (text: CR H516-517)
Progress
Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.
- IntroducedFeb 13, 2013
- Agreed to in HouseFeb 14, 2013
Summary
Recorded votes 2
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 42 | On Agreeing to the Resolution | Passed227–192 | Feb 14, 2013 |
| House 41 | On Ordering the Previous Question | Passed229–194 | Feb 14, 2013 |
Cosponsors
Members who signed on, in the order they did.
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Rules Committee | Reported as an original measure Feb 14, 2013 |
Actions 12
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Feb 14, 2013By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mr. Woodall called up H.Res. 66 and asked for its immediate consideration. (consideration: CR H516-519)
- Feb 14, 2013POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Polis raised a point of order against the provisions of H.Res. 66 because it violates the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H.Res. 66. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order, at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration.
- Feb 14, 2013On motion that the House consider the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H519)
- Feb 14, 2013Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H519-529)
- Feb 14, 2013DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 66.
- Feb 14, 2013On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 194 (Roll no. 41). (consideration: CR H528-529)
- Feb 14, 2013Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 192 (Roll no. 42). (text: CR H516-517)
- Feb 14, 2013Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Feb 13, 2013Introduced in House
- Feb 13, 2013The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-9, by Mr. Woodall.
- Feb 13, 2013Section 2 of the resolution provides that during any recess or adjournment of not more than three days, the Speaker or his designee may reconvene the House at a time other than that previously appointed, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution. Section 3 of the resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules through the legislative day of February 15, 2013, relating to a measure condemning the government of North Korea and its February 12, 2013 test of a nuclear device. Section 4 provides that on any legislative day from February 16, 2013 through February 22, 2013: (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be considered as approved; (b) the Chair may adjourn the House to meet at a date and time within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution. Section 5 authorizes the Speaker to appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 4 as though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
- Feb 13, 2013Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 4.
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Debate and remarks H516–H529Text printed H516Amendments H527Recorded votes H528, H529consideration (H. Res. 66), previous question | Alcee L. Hastings D-FL (amendment), Ami Bera D-CA, Bill Pascrell, Jr. D-NJ, Gerald E. Connolly D-VA, James P. McGovern D-MA, James P. Moran D-VA, Jared Polis D-CO, Louise McIntosh Slaughter D-NY, Rob Woodall R-GA, Robert J. Wittman R-VA, Roger Williams R-TX, Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX | Feb 14, 2013 |
Research
What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
CRS reports 2
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this resolution or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 2
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R40957 | Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: History, Impact, and Issues Archived | Report | Feb 23, 2021 |
| R42395 | A Retrospective of House Rules Changes Since the 110th Congress Archived | Report | Jun 28, 2017 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR 273 | To eliminate the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for Federal employees. | Procedurally related | Feb 25, 2013 |
Titles 1
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 273) to eliminate the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for Federal employees, and for other purposes.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Congress.
Text 2
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Feb 14, 2013Engrossed in House
- Feb 13, 2013Reported in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.
