HR 730 · 111th Congress 2009–2011, ended

Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act

Latest action · Feb 16, 2010 Became Public Law No: 111-140.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJan 27, 2009
  2. Passed HouseMar 24, 2009
  3. Passed SenateDec 23, 2009
  4. To the PresidentFeb 4, 2010
  5. Became lawFeb 16, 2010Public Law 111-140

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on December 23, 2009. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act - Expresses the sense of Congress that the President should: (1) pursue bilateral and multilateral international agreements to establish an international framework for determining the source of any confiscated nuclear or radiological material or weapon, as well as the source of any detonated weapon and the nuclear or radiological material used in such a weapon; (2) develop protocols for the data exchange and dissemination of sensitive information relating to nuclear or radiological materials and samples of controlled nuclear or radiological materials to the extent required by such agreements; and (3) develop expedited protocols for the data exchange and dissemination of sensitive information needed to publicly identify the source of a nuclear detonation.

Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to include within the mission of the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office to: (1) lead the development and implementation of the national strategic five-year plan for improving U.S. nuclear forensic and attribution capabilities required under the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010; (2) establish within the Office a National Technical Nuclear Forensics Center to provide centralized stewardship, planning, assessment, gap analysis, exercises, improvement, and integration for all federal nuclear forensics and attribution activities; (3) establish a National Nuclear Forensics Expertise Development Program that is devoted to developing and maintaining a vibrant and enduring academic pathway from undergraduate to post-doctorate study in nuclear and geochemical science specialties directly relevant to technical nuclear forensics and that shall provide undergraduate and doctoral student scholarships and awards to ensure that faculty and their graduate students have a sustained funding stream; and (4) report to Congress annually on such activities.

Requires the Director of the Office and each of the relevant departments that are partners in the Center to: (1) include, as part of required assessments, evaluations, and reviews, each office's or department's activities and investments in support of nuclear forensics and attribution activities and specific goals and objectives accomplished during the previous year pursuant to the national strategic five-year plan for improving U.S. nuclear forensic and attribution capabilities; (2) attach, as an appendix to the Joint Interagency Annual Review, the most current version of such strategy and plan; and (3) include a description of new or amended bilateral and multilateral agreements and efforts in support of nuclear forensics and attribution activities accomplished during the previous year.

Recorded votes 2

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 16Passed397–10Jan 21, 2010
House 148Passed402–16Mar 24, 2009

Cosponsors 4

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 27, 2009 to Mar 23, 2009; 2 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-TXMichael T. McCaulOriginalJan 27, 2009
D-NYSteve IsraelOriginalJan 27, 2009
D-NYYvette D. ClarkeMar 19, 2009
D-NMBen Ray LujánMar 23, 2009

Committees 3

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseHomeland Security Committee
Referred Jan 27, 2009
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee
Referred Feb 5, 2009
HouseForeign Affairs Committee
Referred Jan 27, 2009
SenateHomeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Referred Mar 26, 2009Markup Nov 4, 2009Reported Dec 17, 2009

Actions 28

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Feb 16, 2010Signed by President.
  2. Feb 16, 2010Became Public Law No: 111-140.
  3. Feb 4, 2010Presented to President.
  4. Jan 21, 2010Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H300-301)
  5. Jan 21, 2010Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 397 - 10 (Roll no. 16). (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR 1/20/2010 H226-227)
  6. Jan 21, 2010Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  7. Jan 21, 2010Cleared for White House.
  8. Jan 20, 2010Ms. Clarke moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H226-229)
  9. Jan 20, 2010DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 730.
  10. Jan 20, 2010At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  11. Dec 24, 2009Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  12. Dec 23, 2009Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S13886-13887; text as passed Senate: S13886-13887)
  13. Dec 17, 2009Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
  14. Dec 17, 2009Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 244.
  15. Nov 4, 2009Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
  16. Mar 26, 2009Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
  17. Mar 24, 2009Mr. Carney moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  18. Mar 24, 2009Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3765-3769)
  19. Mar 24, 2009DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 730.
  20. Mar 24, 2009At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  21. Mar 24, 2009Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3772-3773)
  22. Mar 24, 2009Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 402 - 16 (Roll no. 148). (text: CR H3765-3766)
  23. Mar 24, 2009Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  24. Feb 5, 2009Referred to the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology.
  25. Jan 27, 2009Introduced in House
  26. Jan 27, 2009Referred to House Homeland Security
  27. Jan 27, 2009Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  28. Jan 27, 2009Referred to House Foreign Affairs

In the Congressional Record 5

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseRecorded votes H300Senate amendment—Jan 21, 2010
HouseDebate and remarks H226–H229Amendments H226Adam B. Schiff D-CA, Peter T. King R-NY, Steve King R-IA, Yvette D. Clarke D-NYJan 20, 2010
SenateDebate and remarks S13886, S13887Text printed S13886Amendments S13886Robert P. Casey Jr. D-PADec 23, 2009
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E819Rush Holt D-NJMar 31, 2009
HouseDebate and remarks H3765–H3769Text printed H3765Recorded votes H3772enactAdam B. Schiff D-CA, Bennie G. Thompson D-MS, Christopher P. Carney D-PA, Daniel E. Lungren R-CA, Michael T. McCaul R-TXMar 24, 2009

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

CRS reports 2

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 2

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

ProductTitleKindPublished
R41169Securing Nuclear Materials: The 2012 Summit and Issues for Congress ArchivedReportMar 7, 2012
RL33908Mining on Federal Lands: Hardrock Minerals ArchivedReportJul 17, 2009

Titles 6

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To strengthen efforts in the Department of Homeland Security to develop nuclear forensics capabilities to permit attribution of the source of nuclear material, and for other purposes.
Short Titles as Introduced
Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act
Short Titles as Reported to Senate
Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act
Short Titles as Passed House
Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act
Short Titles as Passed Senate
Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act
Short Titles as Enacted
Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Emergency Management.

Text 6

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. —Enrolled Bill
  2. Dec 23, 2009Engrossed Amendment Senate
  3. Dec 17, 2009Reported to Senate
  4. Mar 26, 2009Referred in Senate
  5. Mar 24, 2009Engrossed in House
  6. Jan 27, 2009Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.