HR 2176 · 110th Congress 2007–2009, ended

To provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian Community.

Latest action · Jun 25, 2008 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMay 3, 2007
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on March 6, 2008. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to take lands identified as alternative lands in the Settlement of Land Claim (the agreement between the Bay Mills Indian Community and the Governor of Michigan executed on August 23, 2002, including the document titled Addendum to Settlement of Land Claim, executed on November 13, 2007) into trust for the benefit of the Community within 30 days after the Secretary has: (1) received a title insurance policy for the alternative lands that shows that such lands are not subject to mortgages, liens, deeds of trust, options to purchase, or other security interests; and (2) confirmed that the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 has been complied with regarding the trust acquisition of the property.

Provides for the alternative lands to become part of the Community's reservation immediately upon attaining trust status.

Requires the alternative lands to be taken into trust as part of the settlement and extinguishment of the Community's Charlotte Beach land claims and to be deemed lands obtained in settlement of a land claim within the meaning of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Extinguishes, concurrent with the Secretary taking the alternative lands into trust, all claims by the Community: (1) to the Charlotte Beach lands; or (2) against the United States, the State of Michigan, or any other person or entity based on or relating to claims to such lands, whether based on aboriginal or recognized title.

Approves and ratifies the Settlement of Land Claim, which shall be enforceable by the Community or the Governorn according to its terms. Vests exclusive jurisdiction over any enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

Recorded votes 2

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 458Failed121–298Jun 25, 2008
House 457Passed226–189Jun 25, 2008

Cosponsors 2

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from May 3, 2007 to Oct 29, 2007; 1 is an original cosponsor, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-MICandice S. MillerOriginalMay 3, 2007
D-RIPatrick J. KennedyOct 29, 2007

Committees 2

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseNatural Resources Committee
Referred May 3, 2007Hearings Feb 6, 2008Markup Feb 13, 2008Reported Mar 6, 2008
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Mar 6, 2008Hearings Mar 14, 2008Markup Apr 2, 2008Reported Apr 4, 2008

Actions 27

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 25, 2008Rule H. Res. 1298 passed House.
  2. Jun 25, 2008Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1298. (consideration: CR H6045-6058; text of measure as introduced: CR H6045)
  3. Jun 25, 2008Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2176. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in this report shall be considered as adopted.
  4. Jun 25, 2008DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2176.
  5. Jun 25, 2008The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H6055)
  6. Jun 25, 2008Mr. Hensarling moved to recommit with instructions to Natural Resources. (consideration: CR H6055-6056; text: CR H6056)
  7. Jun 25, 2008DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hensarling motion to recommit with instructions, pending reservation of a point of order. The instruction contained in the motion seek to report the same back to the House with an amendment to repeal alternative fuel procurement requirement for federal agencies.
  8. Jun 25, 2008Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.
  9. Jun 25, 2008Mr. Rahall raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Rahall stated that the provisions contained in the motion to recommit were not germane to the bill. Sustained by the Chair.
  10. Jun 25, 2008Mr. Hensarling appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the chair. (consideration: CR H6056)
  11. Jun 25, 2008Mr. Rahall moved to table the motion to appeal the ruling of the chair (consideration: CR H6056-6057)
  12. Jun 25, 2008On motion to table the motion to appeal the ruling of the chair Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 189 (Roll no. 457).
  13. Jun 25, 2008Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 121 - 298 (Roll no. 458).
  14. Jun 25, 2008Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  15. Jun 24, 2008Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1298 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2176. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in this report shall be considered as adopted.
  16. Apr 4, 2008Reported adversely by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-541, Part II.
  17. Apr 4, 2008Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 345.
  18. Apr 2, 2008Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  19. Apr 2, 2008Ordered to be Reported Unfavorably by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 0.
  20. Mar 14, 2008Committee Hearings Held.
  21. Mar 6, 2008Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 110-541, Part I.
  22. Mar 6, 2008Referred sequentially to the House Committee on the Judiciary for a period ending not later than April 4, 2008 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(k) of rule X.
  23. Feb 13, 2008Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  24. Feb 13, 2008Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 5.
  25. Feb 6, 2008Committee Hearings Held.
  26. May 3, 2007Introduced in House
  27. May 3, 2007Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H6016–H6022, H6045–H6058Text printed H6016, H6045Amendments H6021Motions H6056Recorded votes H6028, H6057consideration (H. Res. 1298), previous questionRahall motion to table Hensarling appeal of ruling of the Chair relative to Rahall point of order on Hensarling motion to recommitRulings of the chair H6056Alcee L. Hastings D-FL, Bart Stupak D-MI, Candice S. Miller R-MI, Carolyn C. Kilpatrick D-MI, Charles W. Dent R-PA, Dale E. Kildee D-MI, Darrell Issa R-CA, Doc Hastings R-WA (amendment), Don Young R-AK, Jeb Hensarling R-TX (motion), John Campbell R-CA, John Conyers, Jr. D-MI, John D. Dingell D-MI, Jon C. Porter R-NV, Mike Rogers R-MI, Nick J. Rahall II D-WV (motion), Shelley Berkley D-NV, Steve King R-IA, Wm. Lacy Clay D-MOJun 25, 2008

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 4

  1. Apr 3, 2008H.R. 2176, A bill to provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian Community<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on April 2, 2008</p>
  2. Apr 3, 2008H.R. 2176, A bill to provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian CommunityCost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on April 2, 2008
  3. Mar 6, 2008H.R. 2176, A bill to provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian Community<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources on February 13, 2008</p>
  4. Mar 6, 2008H.R. 2176, A bill to provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian CommunityCost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources on February 13, 2008

Amendments 1

Amendments offered to this bill.

AmendmentDescriptionOffered byStatus
HAmdt 1100The amendment in the nature of a substitute consists of the text of H.R. 2176 and the text of H.R. 4115 and is considered as adopted pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1298.Rules CommitteeAmendment in the nature of a substitute reported by the House Committee on Rules. (text: CR H6045-6046)

Related bills 3

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To provide for and approve the settlement of certain land claims of the Bay Mills Indian Community.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Native Americans.

Text 2

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Apr 4, 2008Reported in House
  2. May 3, 2007Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.