HRES 700 · 109th Congress 2005โ€“2007, ended

Supporting an upgrade in Israel's relationship with NATO to that of a leading member of NATO's Individual Cooperation Program, as a first step toward Israel's inclusion in NATO as a full member with all corresponding rights, privileges, and responsibilities.

Latest action · Jun 27, 2006 Committee Agreed to Seek Consideration Under Suspension of the Rules, (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedFeb 28, 2006
  2. Agreed to in HouseNot reached

Summary

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) pluralistic and geographic expansion is necessary for its continued effectiveness and relevance; (2) Israel's demonstrated commitment to uphold democracy and to combat terrorism, in addition to its strategic and military capabilities, make Israel deserving of NATO membership; (3) the United States, as Israel's strong ally, should take the lead in supporting an upgrade in Israel's NATO relationship to that of a leading member of NATO's Individual Cooperation Program as a first step toward Israel's full NATO membership; and (4) Israel's deepened relationship with NATO would be mutually beneficial to both Israel and NATO member states, including the United States.

Cosponsors 26

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Feb 28, 2006 to Mar 28, 2006; 1 is an original cosponsor, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-FLRobert WexlerOriginalFeb 28, 2006
R-PACharles W. DentMar 7, 2006
D-NYEliot L. EngelMar 7, 2006
D-NYGary L. AckermanMar 7, 2006
D-NYJoseph CrowleyMar 7, 2006
R-FLKatherine HarrisMar 7, 2006
R-MIMike RogersMar 7, 2006
R-PAPhil EnglishMar 7, 2006
D-TXAl GreenMar 9, 2006
D-NYCharles B. RangelMar 9, 2006
R-PAJim GerlachMar 9, 2006
R-GAJohn LinderMar 9, 2006
D-ALArtur DavisMar 14, 2006
R-INDan BurtonMar 14, 2006
R-ILDonald A. ManzulloMar 14, 2006
D-TXGene GreenMar 14, 2006
R-SCHenry E. Brown, Jr.Mar 14, 2006
R-FLLincoln Diaz-BalartMar 14, 2006
D-NYMichael R. McNultyMar 14, 2006
D-TXSheila Jackson LeeMar 14, 2006
D-NVShelley BerkleyMar 14, 2006
D-OHSherrod BrownMar 14, 2006
R-MIThaddeus G. McCotterMar 14, 2006
D-PAAllyson Y. SchwartzMar 28, 2006
D-GADavid ScottMar 28, 2006
R-KYGeoff DavisMar 28, 2006

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseForeign Affairs Committee
Referred Feb 28, 2006Markup Jun 27, 2006

Actions 4

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 27, 2006Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  2. Jun 27, 2006Committee Agreed to Seek Consideration Under Suspension of the Rules, (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
  3. Feb 28, 2006Introduced in House
  4. Feb 28, 2006Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.

Research

What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
Supporting an upgrade in Israel's relationship with NATO to that of a leading member of NATO's Individual Cooperation Program, as a first step toward Israel's inclusion in NATO as a full member with all corresponding rights, privileges, and responsibilities.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: International Affairs.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Feb 28, 2006Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.