Federal Emergency Procurement Flexibility Act of 2002
Latest action · May 9, 2002 Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMay 9, 2002
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Authorizes the head of each agency to designate certain employees to make such procurements below a micro-purchase threshold of $15,000 (currently, $2,500) under the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act.
Permits executive agencies to apply to any such procurement specified provisions of law relating to the procurement of commercial items, without regard to whether the property and services are commercial items. Deems the $5 million limitation on the use of special simplified acquisition procedures to be $10 million.
Requires executive agencies to use specified streamlined acquisition authorities and procedures for such procurements.
Allows executive agencies who engage in necessary basic, applied, and advanced research and development projects that have the potential to facilitate defense against or recovery from terrorism or a terrorist attack to exercise specified authority accorded the Secretary of Defense for research project transactions other than contracts and grants and to carry out prototype projects.
Directs executive agencies to conduct market research to identify the capabilities available in the marketplace in furtherance of defense against or recovery from terrorism or a terrorist attack.
Cosponsors 1
Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on May 9, 2002.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-VA | Tom Davis | Original | May 9, 2002 |
Actions 2
Everything that happened, newest first.
- May 9, 2002Introduced in House
- May 9, 2002Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
- Administrative procedure
- Armed forces abroad
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Biological warfare
- Biological weapons
- Chemical warfare
- Chemical weapons
- Commerce
- Congress
- Congressional investigations
- Congressional reporting requirements
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Data banks
- Defense contracts
- Defense procurement
- EBB Terrorism
- Economics and Public Finance
- Federal employees
- Fraud
- Government contractors
- Government Operations and Politics
- Government procurement
- International Affairs
- International military forces
- Law
- Marketing research
- Military operations
- Nuclear terrorism
- Nuclear weapons
- Office of Management and Budget
- Peacekeeping forces
- Prices
- Research and development
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Small business
- Terrorism
- Waste in government spending
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.