No Patient Left Alone Act
- Introduced Jun 20, 2023
- In committee Jun 20, 2023
- Withdrawn
- Passed the Senate
- To the governor
- Became law
What it does
The legislature's own summary of the bill, or its official long title.
This act shall be known as "The No Patient Left Alone Act." It is intended to mitigate unintended negative impacts on patients and their families during a State of Emergency, pandemic, or infectious disease outbreak. This act would require hospitals to allow limited in-person visitation with patients, within designated parameters and limitations in the act. Hospitals would be able to: restrict the number of visitors…
Read the full title (359 words)
This act shall be known as "The No Patient Left Alone Act." It is intended to mitigate unintended negative impacts on patients and their families during a State of Emergency, pandemic, or infectious disease outbreak. This act would require hospitals to allow limited in-person visitation with patients, within designated parameters and limitations in the act. Hospitals would be able to: restrict the number of visitors a patient could receive daily; require visitors to undergo and pass a specified health screening; and use personal protective equipment while visiting. Hospitals must make personal protective equipment required available for visitors for purchase. Entry could be denied to visitors not complying with the requirements, that failed their health screenings, or who were found to have a communicable disease. Attending physicians would retain the authority to deny in-person visitation if they deemed their patients would be at risk for contracting an infectious disease or if they believed visitation posed a serious community health risk. Such determinations would be valid for up to seven days and subject to renewal. Hospitals could deny visitation if a federal order, law, or regulation required it. If a prospective hospital visitor were denied in-person visitation with a patient, the hospital would be required, to its best efforts, to develop alternate visitation protocols that would allow visitation to the greatest extent safely possible. This could include, but not be limited to, streaming audio and video. Hospitals could not prohibit in-person visitation by a religious counselor to a seriously ill or dying patient, providing that the counselor complied with all visitation mandates established pursuant to this act. A visit by a religious counselor would not be counted against any daily visitation limit set by the hospital. The Department of Health and Social Services would be responsible for overseeing the implementation, operation, and enforcement of this act. Hospitals could be subject to fines for violating the terms of this act, providing the violations continue after the hospitals have been informed of the need to take corrective action. This section does not create a civil cause of action against a hospital or physician. This measure would become effective 180 days after its enactment.
Every action
6 steps, oldest first, as the legislature records them.
- CommitteeIntroduced and Assigned to Health & Human Development Committee in House · House Health & Human Development
- CommitteeReported Out of Committee (Health & Human Development) in House with 2 Favorable, 10 On Its Merits · House Health & Human Development
- HouseAmendment HA 1 to HB 242 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
- HouseSubstituted in House by HS 1 for HB 242
- HouseHS 1 for HB 242 - Passed By House. Votes: 28 YES 13 NO
- SenateHS 1 for HB 242 - Assigned to Health & Social Services Committee in Senate
Roll calls
No recorded votes on this bill yet.
Sponsors
The member who introduced it, joined by 11 cosponsors: 7 Republicans, 4 Democrats.
- TD Timothy D. DukesR Primary sponsor · District 40
- NP Nicole PooreD Joint sponsor · District 12
From Delaware's official records (legis.delaware.gov), checked Nov 1, 2026. Text links go to the official versions; LegiList does not copy bill text.