HR 2181 · 116th Congress 2019–2021, ended

Chaco Cultural Heritage Area Protection Act of 2019

Fact sheet

Latest action · Oct 31, 2019 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedApr 9, 2019
  2. Passed HouseOct 30, 2019
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Chaco Cultural Heritage Area Protection Act of 2019

This bill withdraws any federal lands and interests that are within the boundaries of the Chaco Cultural Heritage Withdrawal Area and any land or interest located in such area which is acquired by the United States after enactment of this bill from

  • entry, appropriation, and disposal under the public land laws;
  • location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
  • operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws.

The Department of the Interior may convey the federal lands to, or exchange such lands with, an Indian tribe in accordance with an approved resource management plan.

Certain oil and gas leases for federal lands on which drilling options have not started before the end of the primary term of the applicable lease and that are not producing oil or gas in paying quantities

  • must terminate by operation of law pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act and federal regulations, and
  • may not be extended by Interior.

Any portion of federal land subject to such a lease that has been terminated, relinquished, or acquired by the United States shall also be withdrawn as described above.

Recorded votes 5

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 597Passed245–174Oct 30, 2019
House 596Failed199–222Oct 30, 2019
House 595Failed181–245Oct 30, 2019
House 594Failed181–243Oct 30, 2019
House 593Failed191–233Oct 30, 2019

Cosponsors 10

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Apr 9, 2019 to Sep 9, 2019, with 3 there on the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-NMDebra A. HaalandOriginalApr 9, 2019
D-AZRaúl M. GrijalvaOriginalApr 9, 2019
D-NMXochitl Torres SmallOriginalApr 9, 2019
D-CAAlan S. LowenthalApr 10, 2019
D-AZRuben GallegoJun 4, 2019
D-CAJared HuffmanJun 5, 2019
D-KSSharice DavidsJun 6, 2019
D-NYPaul TonkoJun 10, 2019
R-OKTom ColeJul 15, 2019
D-CATed LieuSep 9, 2019

Actions 34

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Oct 31, 2019Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  2. Oct 30, 2019Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 656. (consideration: CR H8622-8640; text: CR H8631-8632)
  3. Oct 30, 2019DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 656, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Arrington Amendment No. 4.
  4. Oct 30, 2019DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 656, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar Amendment No. 2.
  5. Oct 30, 2019DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 656, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gosar Amendment No. 3.

Amendments 4

Amendments offered to this bill.

AmendmentDescriptionOffered byStatus
HAmdt 655An amendment numbered 1 printed in Part E of House Report 116-264 to amend a finding to further clarify that this legislation only impacts federal lands and federal minerals and has no impact on valid existing rights, including the development rights of any Indian Tribe or member of an Indian Tribe.Ben Ray Luján D-NMOn agreeing to the Lujan amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote.
HAmdt 656Amendment sought to allow conveyance or exchange of federal land within the withdrawal area to or with state trust land entities, as well as Indian tribes.Paul A. Gosar R-AZOn agreeing to the Gosar amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 191 - 233 (Roll no. 593).
HAmdt 657An amendment numbered 3 printed in Part E of House Report 116-264 to delay permanent mineral withdrawal until Secretary of the Interior determines that the withdrawal wont impact the ability to develop or the economic value of mineral rights held by Native Americans in the withdrawal area or the great Chaco region.Paul A. Gosar R-AZOn agreeing to the Gosar amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 181 - 243 (Roll no. 594).
HAmdt 658Amendment sought to allow operators to continue new oil and gas development in the proposed exclusionary zone if operators have previously been in accordance with the Historic Preservation Act as well as existing rules and regulations for archaeological sites and areas of sensitivity in Chaco Canyon Historical Park.Jodey C. Arrington R-TXOn agreeing to the Arrington amendment (A004) Failed by recorded vote: 181 - 245 (Roll no. 595).

Related bills 2

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Oct 31, 2019Referred in Senate
  2. Oct 30, 2019Engrossed in House
  3. Oct 4, 2019Reported in House
  4. Apr 9, 2019Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.