HRES 682 · 115th Congress 2017–2019, ended

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 139) to implement the use of Rapid DNA instruments to inform decisions about pretrial release or detention and their conditions, to solve and prevent violent crimes and other crimes, to exonerate the innocent, to prevent DNA analysis backlogs, and for other purposes.

Latest action · Jan 10, 2018 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedJan 9, 2018
  2. Agreed to in HouseJan 10, 2018

Summary

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (S. 139) to implement the use of Rapid DNA instruments to inform decisions about pretrial release or detention and their conditions, to solve and prevent violent crimes and other crimes, to exonerate the innocent, to prevent DNA analysis backlogs.

Recorded votes 1

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 8Passed233–181Jan 10, 2018

Cosponsors

Members who signed on, in the order they did.

No cosponsors are on file for this measure.

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseRules Committee
Reported as an original measure Jan 10, 2018

Actions 10

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jan 10, 2018Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H103-112)
  2. Jan 10, 2018DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 682.
  3. Jan 10, 2018The previous question was ordered without objection.
  4. Jan 10, 2018Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 181 (Roll no. 8).(text: CR H103)
  5. Jan 10, 2018On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 181 (Roll no. 8). (text: CR H103)

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H103–H112Text printed H103Recorded votes H111Alcee L. Hastings D-FL, Brian K. Fitzpatrick R-PA, Denny Heck D-WA, Doug Collins R-GA, F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. R-WI, Liz Cheney R-WY, Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX, Zoe Lofgren D-CAJan 10, 2018

Research

What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Committee report

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 139FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017Procedurally relatedJan 19, 2018

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 139) to implement the use of Rapid DNA instruments to inform decisions about pretrial release or detention and their conditions, to solve and prevent violent crimes and other crimes, to exonerate the innocent, to prevent DNA analysis backlogs, and for other purposes.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Congress.

Text 2

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jan 10, 2018Engrossed in House
  2. Jan 9, 2018Reported in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.