Administrative Leave Act of 2016
Latest action · Jul 6, 2016 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 545.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJan 20, 2016
- Passed SenateNot reached
- Passed HouseNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Administrative Leave Act of 2016
(Sec. 2) This bill expresses the sense of Congress that:
- federal agency use of administrative leave has exceeded reasonable amounts, resulting in significant cost to the federal government;
- administrative leave should be used sparingly;
- an agency should consider other actions to address personnel issues, including temporary reassignment, transfer, and telework;
- an agency should prioritize and expeditiously conclude an investigation in which an employee is placed in administrative leave so that the employee is returned to duty status or an appropriate personnel action is taken by the conclusion of the leave period;
- there are too many examples of employees placed in administrative leave for six months or longer;
- an agency should ensure accurate and consistent recording of the use of administrative leave so that such leave can be managed and overseen effectively; and
- other forms of excused absence authorized by law should be recorded separately from administrative leave.
(Sec. 3) The bill: (1) prohibits an agency from placing an employee in administrative leave for more than five consecutive days; (2) requires agencies to record administrative leave separately from other types of leave; (3) requires the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to prescribe regulations with respect to acceptable agency uses of, and proper recording of, administrative leave and other leave authorized by law; (4) directs agencies to revise and implement their internal policies to meet the requirements of this bill; and (5) requires OPM to report to specified congressional committees on agency use of administrative leave.
(Sec. 4) In lieu of administrative leave, agencies may place an employee in investigative or notice leave if the employee is under investigation or the target of an adverse action. An agency may not place an employee in investigative or notice leave unless the continued presence of the employee in the workplace may pose a threat, cause loss of, or damage to, government property, or otherwise jeopardize legitimate government interests. Before placing an employee on investigative or notice leave, an agency must consider other options, including reassigning the employee, allowing the employee to take available leave, allowing the employee to telework, or treating the employee as absent without leave. The day after a period of investigative leave ends, the agency shall take one of such options, return the employee to regular duty status, propose or initiate an adverse action against the employee, or extend the period of investigative leave. The bill sets forth requirements for extending such leave.
The Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency shall issue guidance on best practices for consultation between an investigator and an agency on the need to place an employee in investigative leave.
(Sec. 5) Agencies may grant leave to employees without loss of or reduction in pay, other leave, or credit for time or service if, due to an act of God, a terrorist attack, or another condition, such employees are prevented from safely traveling to or performing work at an approved location.
(Sec. 6) OPM must report to Congress within three years on whether agency policies comply with the requirements of this bill.
Cosponsors 5
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jan 20, 2016 to Feb 9, 2016, with 3 there on the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-IA | Chuck Grassley | Original | Jan 20, 2016 |
| R-WI | Ron Johnson | Original | Jan 20, 2016 |
| D-DE | Thomas R. Carper | Original | Jan 20, 2016 |
| R-OK | James Lankford | Feb 8, 2016 | |
| D-MO | Claire McCaskill | Feb 9, 2016 |
Actions 5
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jul 6, 2016Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-292.
- Jul 6, 2016Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 545.
- Feb 10, 2016Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- Jan 20, 2016Introduced in Senate
- Jan 20, 2016Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Related bills 2
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 2976 | DHS Accountability Act of 2016 | Related bill | Jun 28, 2016 |
| S 3011 | Bolster Accountability to Drive Government Efficiency and Reform Washington Act of 2016 | Related bill | Jun 6, 2016 |
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
Text 2
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Jul 6, 2016Reported to Senate
- Jan 20, 2016Introduced in Senate
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.