HR 2017 · 114th Congress 2015–2017, ended

Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015

Fact sheet

Latest action · Feb 22, 2016 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedApr 23, 2015
  2. Passed HouseFeb 12, 2016
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise the nutritional information that chain restaurants and retail food establishments must disclose. The nutrient content disclosure statement on the menu or menu board must include: (1) the number of calories contained in the whole menu item; (2) the number of servings and number of calories per serving; or (3) the number of calories per common unit of the item, such as for a multi-serving item that is typically divided before presentation to the consumer. Nutritional information may be provided solely by a remote-access menu (e.g., an Internet menu) for food establishments where the majority of orders are placed by customers who are off premises.

Establishments with self-serve food may comply with the requirements for restaurants or place signs with nutritional information adjacent to each food item.

Reasonable variations in the actual nutrient content of items are permissible, including variations in serving size or ingredients or variations due to inadvertent human error.

Establishments with standard menu items that come in different flavors, varieties, or combinations, that are listed as a single menu item can determine and disclose nutritional information using specified methods or methods allowed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Regulations pursuant to this Act cannot take effect earlier than two years after final regulations are promulgated.

The FDA must give establishments in violation of nutritional labeling requirements 90 days to correct violations.

The FDA may no longer allow states or localities to vary from federal nutritional labeling requirements for chain restaurants.

(Sec. 3) Restaurants and retail food establishments are not liable in a civil action for claims regarding federal or state nutritional labeling requirements unless the action is brought by the United States or a state.

Recorded votes 3

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 81Passed266–144Feb 12, 2016
House 80Failed148–258Feb 12, 2016
House 79Agreed to309–100Feb 12, 2016

Cosponsors 99

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Apr 23, 2015 to Dec 18, 2015, with 1 there on the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-CALoretta SanchezOriginalApr 23, 2015
R-NCRenee L. EllmersApr 28, 2015
R-ARSteve WomackApr 28, 2015
R-MOAnn WagnerMay 12, 2015
R-AREric A. "Rick" CrawfordMay 12, 2015
R-MIFred UptonMay 12, 2015
R-WIGlenn GrothmanMay 12, 2015
R-OHJim JordanMay 12, 2015
R-MIJohn R. MoolenaarMay 12, 2015
R-NDKevin CramerMay 12, 2015
R-UTRob BishopMay 12, 2015
R-MOSam GravesMay 12, 2015
R-WVAlexander X. MooneyMay 14, 2015
R-KYBrett GuthrieMay 14, 2015
R-WIReid J. RibbleMay 14, 2015

Actions 30

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Feb 22, 2016Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  2. Feb 12, 2016Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 611. (consideration: CR H789-802)
  3. Feb 12, 2016DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 611, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schrader amendment No. 3.
  4. Feb 12, 2016DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 611, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McMorris Rodgers amendment No. 1.
  5. Feb 12, 2016GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2017.

Amendments 2

Amendments offered to this bill.

AmendmentDescriptionOffered byStatus
HAmdt 942Amendment ensures that businesses will not be penalized for inadvertent human error in preparation or variation of ingredients.Cathy McMorris Rodgers R-WAOn agreeing to the McMorris Rodgers amendment (A001) Agreed to by recorded vote: 309 - 100, 1 Presen
HAmdt 943Amendment sought to strike the "off-premises" ordering exception from bill.Kurt Schrader D-OROn agreeing to the Schrader amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 148 - 258, 1 Present (Roll no.

Related bills 2

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Health.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Feb 22, 2016Referred in Senate
  2. Feb 12, 2016Engrossed in House
  3. Feb 2, 2016Reported in House
  4. Apr 23, 2015Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.