HR 1455 · 113th Congress 2013–2015, ended

Contract Screener Reform and Accountability Act

Fact sheet

Latest action · Apr 24, 2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedApr 10, 2013
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Contract Screener Reform and Accountability Act - Repeals the authority of Under Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration [TSA]) to waive the requirement that a private screening company be owned and controlled by a U.S. citizen for any company that is a U.S. subsidiary of a foreign-owned corporation that has implemented a foreign ownership, control, or influence mitigation plan approved by the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense (DOD).

Repeals the requirement that an airport operator, when submitting an application for a private screening company at the airport, to recommend to the Under Secretary which company would best serve the airport's security screening and passenger needs.

Prohibits the Under Secretary from: (1) entering a screening services contract that would allow for a subcontractor to perform such services, or (2) providing funding (for bonuses or other awards) to any private screening company in excess of the amount required for the performance of screening services.

Repeals specified requirements to grant the Under Secretary discretion in whether to approve airport operator applications to have screening operations carried out by a private company.

Allows the Under Secretary to take up to 270 days to award a screening contract to a qualified screening company after approving the application.

Directs the Comptroller General (GAO) to provide to the Under Secretary guidance on how to analyze the total annual cost incurred by the federal government with respect to screening services by private companies. Requires the Under Secretary to use such guidance to identify costs incurred by the government from overseeing the performance of private screening companies, compared with costs incurred at airports using federal personnel for passenger and baggage screening.

Requires any airport operator using contract passenger and baggage screeners employed by a private screening company to display signs prominently to notify the flying public that screening is conducted by contract screening personnel and not by federal personnel.

Requires the Under Secretary to inform any airport operator opting to discontinue screening by a qualified private company in favor of screening by TSA personnel on how transition to TSA screening services will be carried out.

Directs the Under Secretary to develop and implement a system to enhance monitoring of private screening company performance by the contracting officer overseeing each respective company.

Requires a private screening company to report regularly to the Under Secretary each security breach at an airport where it conducts baggage and passenger screening.

Requires the Comptroller General to conduct annual covert testing of airports where private screening companies do the screening.

Makes it a condition for the Under Secretary on contracting with a private screening company to provide screening at an airport that neither the private screening company, nor its parent company, if any, has knowingly compromised any covert security testing, especially by notifying its employees that it was occurring.

Directs the Under Secretary to require each private screening company to provide all its employees with annual training for the proper handling of all sensitive information, including sensitive security information.

Adds to the qualifications of a qualified private screening company that it will provide the right of first refusal of employment to existing federal government personnel.

Requires each private screening company with a contract for screening services to provide the Under Secretary each month with: (1) information on retention rates of screeners and supervisory personnel it employs at each airport, and (2) a detailed description of adverse employment actions taken against any of such screeners or supervisory personnel.

Directs the Under Secretary to establish a process by which any person may report problems, deficiencies, waste, or vulnerabilities with respect to screening services provided by a private company. Prohibits a private screening company from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or other privileges of employment because of such reporting, or related testimony to Congress, or any refusal to engage in any unlawful practice.

Cosponsors 3

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Apr 10, 2013 to Jun 12, 2013, with 2 there on the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-LACedric L. RichmondOriginalApr 10, 2013
D-NYNita M. LoweyOriginalApr 10, 2013
D-NYYvette D. ClarkeJun 12, 2013

Actions 4

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Apr 24, 2013Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
  2. Apr 10, 2013Introduced in House
  3. Apr 10, 2013Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
  4. Apr 10, 2013Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E407-408)

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 697Contract Screener Reform and Accountability ActRelated billApr 10, 2013

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Transportation and Public Works.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Apr 10, 2013Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.