STEM Opportunities Act of 2013
Latest action · Jun 24, 2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMar 21, 2013
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
STEM Opportunities Act of 2013 - Directs the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to provide federal science agencies with guidance on establishing specified policies to accommodate the needs of caregiver researchers who receive their research awards.
Requires each federal science agency to annually collect and submit to the National Science Foundation (NSF) institution-level data on demographics, primary field, award type, review rating (as practicable), budget request, funding outcome, and awarded budget for all applications for merit-reviewed research and development grants to institutions of higher education (IHEs) and federal laboratories. Requires NSF to publish a statistical summary of that data.
Directs OSTP, in collaboration with NSF, to identify and disseminate to federal science agencies information and best practices useful in educating program officers and members of standing peer review committees at federal science agencies about: (1) research on implicit gender, race, or ethnic bias; and (2) methods to minimize the effect of such bias in federal research grant reviews.
Requires federal science agencies to maintain or develop and implement policies and practices to minimize the effects of implicit bias in federal research grant reviews.
Directs NSF, within three years of this Act's enactment and at least every five years thereafter, to conduct a survey to collect institution-level data on the demographics of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty, by broad fields of STEM, at different types of IHEs. Requires NSF to publish a statistical summary of that data.
Requires NSF to develop written guidance for IHEs on the best practices for: (1) conducting periodic campus culture surveys of STEM departments; and (2) educating STEM faculty and administrators about implicit bias in recruiting, evaluating, and promoting STEM students and faculty.
Directs NSF to broadly disseminate that guidance to IHEs that receive federal research funding.
Directs OSTP to develop written guidance for federal laboratories to develop and implement practices and policies to: (1) conduct periodic laboratory-wide culture surveys of research personnel at all levels; and (2) educate STEM research personnel about implicit bias in recruiting, evaluating, and promoting researchers at federal laboratories.
Requires federal science agencies to maintain or develop and implement such policies for their laboratories.
Directs NSF to recommend a uniform policy for federal science agencies to carry out workshops to educate STEM department chairs at IHEs, senior managers at federal laboratories, and other federally funded researchers about methods of minimizing the effects of implicit bias in the career advancement of academic and federal STEM researchers.
Requires NSF to award research grants and conduct dissemination activities consistent with this Act's goal of ensuring that federal science agencies and IHE research grant recipients are fully engaging their talent pool.
Directs NSF to award competitive grants to IHEs to develop innovative reform efforts designed to increase the recruitment, retention, and advancement of individuals from underrepresented minority groups in academic STEM careers.
Requires NSF to award competitive grants to IHEs to implement or expand research-based reforms in undergraduate STEM education to recruit and retain minority students who are underrepresented in STEM fields, with a priority focus on the natural science and engineering fields.
Requires each grant to include an education research component so that reform efforts can be evaluated and, if shown to be effective, replicated to improve the participation of minority students in STEM fields at other schools.
Cosponsors 19
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 21, 2013 to Jul 23, 2013; 13 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-PA | Allyson Y. Schwartz | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-IL | Bobby L. Rush | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-IL | Danny K. Davis | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-WA | Derek Kilmer | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-VI | Donna M. Christensen | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-DC | Eleanor Holmes Norton | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-CA | Julia Brownley | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-CA | Mark Takano | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-CA | Michael M. Honda | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-WA | Rick Larsen | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-TX | Ruben Hinojosa | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-NY | Yvette D. Clarke | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-CA | Zoe Lofgren | Original | Mar 21, 2013 |
| D-MD | Donna F. Edwards | Apr 12, 2013 | |
| D-TX | Marc A. Veasey | Apr 12, 2013 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Science, Space, and Technology Committee | Referred Mar 21, 2013 |
| Research and Technology Subcommittee | Referred Jun 24, 2013 |
Actions 3
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jun 24, 2013Referred to the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
- Mar 21, 2013Introduced in House
- Mar 21, 2013Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Debate and remarks H2289 | Eddie Bernice Johnson D-TX | Apr 24, 2013 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H1827.
CRS reports 1
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 1
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| RL34736 | The President’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): Issues for Congress Archived | Report | Feb 7, 2014 |
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To direct the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to carry out programs and activities to ensure that Federal science agencies and institutions of higher education receiving Federal research and development funding are fully engaging their entire talent pool, and for other purposes.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- STEM Opportunities Act of 2013
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications.
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures
- Adoption and foster care
- Census and government statistics
- Child care and development
- Education programs funding
- Elementary and secondary education
- Government information and archives
- Higher education
- Minority education
- Minority employment
- National Science Foundation
- Office of Science and Technology Policy
- Research administration and funding
- Research and development
- Science and engineering education
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Sex, gender, sexual orientation discrimination
- Teaching, teachers, curricula
- Women's education
- Women's employment
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Mar 21, 2013Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.