HR 869 · 112th Congress 2011โ€“2013, ended

To clarify the definition of flood control operations for the purposes of the operation and maintenance of Project No. 2179 on the Lower Merced River.

Latest action · Jun 14, 2011 Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMar 2, 2011
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Amends federal law designating segments of the Lower Merced River for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic Rivers System and providing that such designation shall not affect the continued operation and maintenance (including flood control operations) of the New Exchequer Project to define "flood control operations" to include occasional short-term increases in the level of Lake McClure not to exceed elevation 877 feet mean sea level for not to exceed 60 days between May 1 and July 31 of above-normal water years, as defined by the San Joaquin Valley 60-20-20 Hydrological Classification Index, developed by the California State Water Resources Control Board, or any successor index applicable to the Merced River watershed.

Cosponsors 4

Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Mar 2, 2011.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-CADennis A. CardozaOriginalMar 2, 2011
R-CADevin NunesOriginalMar 2, 2011
D-CAJim CostaOriginalMar 2, 2011
R-CAKevin McCarthyOriginalMar 2, 2011

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseNatural Resources Committee
Referred Mar 2, 2011
Federal Lands Subcommittee
Referred Mar 3, 2011Hearings Jun 14, 2011

Actions 4

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 14, 2011Subcommittee Hearings Held.
  2. Mar 3, 2011Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
  3. Mar 2, 2011Introduced in House
  4. Mar 2, 2011Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Constitutional authority

Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. Page 311 U.S. 426. ``In our view, it cannot properly be said that the constitutional power of the United States over its waters is limited to control for navigation. By navigation, respondent means no more than operation of boats and improvement of the waterway itself. In truth, the authority of the United States is the regulation of commerce on its waters. Navigability, in the sense just stated, is but a part of this whole. Flood protection, watershed development, recovery of the cost of improvements through utilization of power are likewise parts of commerce control.''

The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H1524.

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To clarify the definition of flood control operations for the purposes of the operation and maintenance of Project No. 2179 on the Lower Merced River.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Water Resources Development.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Mar 2, 2011Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.