Manhattan Project National Historical Park Act
Latest action · Sep 20, 2012 On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 237 - 180 (Roll no. 591).
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJun 21, 2012
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.)
Manhattan Project National Historical Park Act - (Sec. 5) Establishes the Manhattan Project National Historical Park as a unit of the National Park System, which may be composed of specified facilities, lands, or interests in land in one or more eligible areas or parts of such areas in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Los Alamos, New Mexico; and Hanford, Washington. Requires inclusion of the B Reactor National Historic Landmark in Hanford.
(Sec. 6) Directs the Secretary of the Interior (the Secretary) and the Secretary of Energy (DOE) to enter into an agreement to govern their respective roles in administering the facilities, lands, or interests in land under DOE's jurisdiction to be included in the Park.
Requires the Secretary under any such agreement to: (1) have decisionmaking authority for the content of the historic interpretation of the Manhattan Project for purposes of administering the Historical Park, and (2) ensure that the agreement provides for an appropriate advisory role for the National Park Service (NPS) in preserving the historic resources covered by the agreement.
Requires the DOE Secretary under any such agreement to: (1) ensure that the agreement appropriately protects public safety, national security, and other aspects of the ongoing mission of DOE at the Oak Ridge Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford Site; (2) retain responsibility for any necessary environmental remediation; and (3) retain authority and legal obligations for historic preservation and general maintenance.
(Sec. 7) Requires the Secretary to consult with interested state, county, and local officials, and members of the public before executing any such agreement and in developing the general management plan.
(Sec. 8) Requires the Secretary to develop a general management plan for the Park in consultation and collaboration with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Richland DOE site offices.
Authorizes the Secretary to provide interpretive tours of historically significant Manhattan Project sites and resources that are located outside the boundary of the Park.
Prohibits the acquisition by condemnation of any land or interest in land for the purposes of this Act.
Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) enter into agreements with federal agencies to provide public access to, and management, interpretation, and historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan Project resources under their control; and (2) accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements with, state governments, local governments, tribal governments, organizations, or individuals to further the purpose of such an interagency agreement, or to provide visitor services and administrative facilities within proximity to the Historical Park.
Authorizes the Secretary to provide technical assistance to such governments, organizations, or individuals for the management, interpretation, and historic preservation of historically significant Manhattan Project resources not included in the Historical Park.
(Sec. 9) Prohibits anything in this Act, the establishment of the Historical Park, or the management plan for the Historical Park from being construed as creating buffer zones outside of the Park.
Prohibits anything in this Act from constituting a cause of action respecting activities outside or adjacent to the established boundary of the Park.
Recorded votes 1
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 591 | On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended | Failed237–180 | Sep 20, 2012 |
Cosponsors 4
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jun 21, 2012 to Sep 10, 2012; 2 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-NM | Ben Ray Luján | Original | Jun 21, 2012 |
| R-TN | Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann | Original | Jun 21, 2012 |
| D-WA | Norman D. Dicks | Jun 29, 2012 | |
| R-NY | Michael G. Grimm | Sep 10, 2012 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Natural Resources Committee | Referred Jun 21, 2012Markup Jul 11, 2012Reported Sep 18, 2012 |
| Federal Lands Subcommittee | Referred Jun 21, 2012Hearings Jun 28, 2012Discharged Jul 11, 2012 |
Actions 15
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Sep 20, 2012Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6195-6196)
- Sep 20, 2012Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 237 - 180 (Roll no. 591).
- Sep 19, 2012Mr. Hastings (WA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- Sep 19, 2012Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6128-6132; text of measure as reported in House: CR H6128-6130)
- Sep 19, 2012DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5987.
- Sep 19, 2012At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- Sep 18, 2012Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 112-676.
- Sep 18, 2012Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 488.
- Jul 11, 2012Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Discharged.
- Jul 11, 2012Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- Jul 11, 2012Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
- Jun 28, 2012Subcommittee Hearings Held.
- Jun 21, 2012Introduced in House
- Jun 21, 2012Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Jun 21, 2012Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
In the Congressional Record 5
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E1659 | Betty McCollum D-MN | Sep 28, 2012 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E1657 | Brad Sherman D-CA | Sep 25, 2012 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E1652 | Earl Blumenauer D-OR | Sep 21, 2012 |
| House | Recorded votes H6196enact | — | Sep 20, 2012 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6128–H6132Text printed H6128–H6130 | Dennis J. Kucinich D-OH, Doc Hastings R-WA | Sep 19, 2012 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the page H3975.
Printed hearings 2
Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.
| Number | Hearing | Committee | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serial No. 112-118 | H.R. 624, H.R. 3640, H.R. 4109, H.R. 4334, H.R. 4484, H.R. 5319, H.R. 5958 AND H.R. 5987117 pages | Natural Resources Committee | Jun 28, 2012 |
| S. Hrg. 112-578 | NATIONAL PARKS LEGISLATION94 pages | Energy and Natural Resources Committee | Jun 27, 2012 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 3300 | Manhattan Project National Historical Park Act | Related bill | Jun 27, 2012 |
Titles 3
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To establish the Manhattan Project National Historical Park in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Los Alamos, New Mexico, and Hanford, Washington, and for other purposes.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Manhattan Project National Historical Park Act
- Short Titles as Reported to House
- Manhattan Project National Historical Park Act
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources.
Text 2
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Sep 18, 2012Reported in House
- Jun 21, 2012Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.