HRES 954 · 111th Congress 2009–2011, ended

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the scientific protocols, data collection methods, and peer review standards for climate change research which are necessary to preclude future infringements of the public trust.

Latest action · Dec 8, 2009 Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedDec 8, 2009
  2. Agreed to in HouseNot reached

Summary

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) the establishment of scientific protocols and a robust oversight mechanism governing an infrastructure of observing, monitoring, measuring, and verification technologies, data collection methods, and peer review standards is necessary to preclude future infringements of public trust by scientific falsification and fraud; and (2) climate change research information provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change should meet federal standards for scientific research as defined by the National Science and Technology Council and the National Academy of Sciences before being used as the basis for action by the U.S. government.

Cosponsors 17

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Dec 8, 2009 to Jan 19, 2010; 11 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
R-CABrian P. BilbrayOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-CADana RohrabacherOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-WIF. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.OriginalDec 8, 2009
R-ILJudy BiggertOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-TXLamar SmithOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-TXMichael T. McCaulOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-GAPaul C. BrounOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-TXPete OlsonOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-TXRandy NeugebauerOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-MDRoscoe G. BartlettOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-MOW. Todd AkinOriginalDec 8, 2009
R-FLBill PoseyDec 10, 2009
R-FLMario Diaz-BalartDec 10, 2009
R-ALSpencer BachusDec 10, 2009
R-CAKen CalvertDec 11, 2009
R-PAJim GerlachDec 16, 2009
R-ARJohn BoozmanJan 19, 2010

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseScience, Space, and Technology Committee
Referred Dec 8, 2009

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Dec 8, 2009Introduced in House
  2. Dec 8, 2009Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H13605-13606)
  3. Dec 8, 2009Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.

In the Congressional Record 1

Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
HouseDebate and remarks H13605–H13607Bob Inglis R-SC, Pete Olson R-TX, Ralph M. Hall R-TXDec 8, 2009

Research

What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Printed hearings 1

Hearings whose printed record names this resolution, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.

Titles 1

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the scientific protocols, data collection methods, and peer review standards for climate change research which are necessary to preclude future infringements of the public trust.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Dec 8, 2009Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.