Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Latest action · Jul 22, 2009 On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 189, 14 Present (Roll no. 605).
Progress
Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.
- IntroducedJul 22, 2009
- Agreed to in HouseNot reached
Summary
Requires the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to immediately establish an investigative subcommittee and begin an investigation into the relationship between: (1) the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided prominent defense-lobbying firm; and (2) earmark requests made by Members on behalf of the firm's clients.
Recorded votes 1
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 605 | On Motion to Table | Passed224–189 | Jul 22, 2009 |
Cosponsors
Members who signed on, in the order they did.
Actions 4
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jul 22, 2009Introduced in House
- Jul 22, 2009Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H8509-8510; text of measure as introduced: CR H8509)
- Jul 22, 2009Mr. Andrews moved to table the measure.
- Jul 22, 2009On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 189, 14 Present (Roll no. 605).
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this resolution, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Debate and remarks H8509Text printed H8509Motions H8509Recorded votes H8509Andrews motion to table | Jeff Flake R-AZ, Robert E. Andrews D-NJ (motion) | Jul 22, 2009 |
Research
What has been written about this resolution: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
CRS reports 1
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this resolution or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 1
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R44005 | Questions of the Privileges of the House: An Analysis | Report | Aug 5, 2015 |
Related bills 7
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRES 189 | Raising a question of the privileges of the House. | Related bill | Feb 25, 2009 |
| HRES 212 | Raising a question of the privileges of the House. | Related bill | Mar 5, 2009 |
| HRES 228 | Raising a question of the privileges of the House. | Related bill | Mar 10, 2009 |
| HRES 265 | Raising a question of the privileges of the House. | Related bill | Mar 19, 2009 |
| HRES 286 | Raising a question of the privileges of the House. | Related bill | Mar 25, 2009 |
Titles 1
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Congress.
- Appropriations
- Congress
- Congressional committees
- Congressional elections
- Defense spending
- Elections, voting, political campaign regulation
- Government ethics and transparency, public corruption
- Government studies and investigations
- House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct
- House of Representatives
- Members of Congress
- Public participation and lobbying
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Jul 22, 2009Laid on Table in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.