National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010
Latest action · Sep 24, 2010 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJul 1, 2010
- Passed HouseSep 23, 2010
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010 - Amends the National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005 to include as a purpose of such Act to foster the establishment of state-administered controlled substance monitoring systems in order to ensure that appropriate law enforcement, regulatory, and state professional licensing authorities have access to prescription history information for the purposes of investigating drug diversion and prescribing and dispensing practices of errant prescribers or pharmacists.
Amends the Public Health Service Act to revise and update the controlled substance monitoring program, including to: (1) allow grants to be used to maintain and operate existing state controlled substance monitoring programs; (2) require the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to redistribute any funds that are returned among the remaining grantees; (3) require a state to provide the Secretary with aggregate data and other information to enable the Secretary to evaluate the success of the state's program and to submit a progress report to Congress; and (4) expand the program to include any commonwealth or territory of the United States.
Authorizes the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) or a state medicaid program or state health department receiving nonidentifiable information from a controlled substance monitoring database to make such information available to other entities for research purposes.
Requires a state receiving a grant to: (1) facilitate prescriber use of the state's controlled substance monitoring system; and (2) educate prescribers on the benefits of the system both to them and society.
Revises preferences for grants related to drug abuse to authorize the Secretary to give preference to eligible states or tribes that put forth a good faith effort to meet minimum requirements under the controlled substance monitoring program.
Authorizes appropriations for FY2011-FY2013.
Recorded votes 1
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 544 | On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended | Passed384–32 | Sep 23, 2010 |
Cosponsors 18
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jul 1, 2010 to Sep 22, 2010; 16 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-TN | Bart Gordon | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-MI | Bart Stupak | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-NY | Carolyn B. Maloney | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-TX | Charles A. Gonzalez | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-OH | Charles A. Wilson | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-VI | Donna M. Christensen | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-NJ | Frank Pallone, Jr. | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-TX | Gene Green | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-CA | George Radanovich | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-IL | John Shimkus | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-PA | Joseph R. Pitts | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-TN | Marsha Blackburn | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-MI | Mike Rogers | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-GA | Phil Gingrey | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-GA | Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| D-WI | Steve Kagen | Original | Jul 1, 2010 |
| R-MN | Erik Paulsen | Jul 26, 2010 | |
| R-IL | Aaron Schock | Sep 22, 2010 |
Committees 2
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Energy and Commerce Committee | Referred Jul 1, 2010Markup Jul 28, 2010Reported Sep 22, 2010 |
| Health Subcommittee | Referred Jul 13, 2010Hearings Jul 22, 2010Markup Jul 22, 2010Reported Jul 22, 2010 | |
| Senate | Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee | Referred Sep 24, 2010 |
Actions 18
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Sep 24, 2010Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sep 23, 2010Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6942-6943)
- Sep 23, 2010Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 384 - 32 (Roll no. 544). (text: CR 9/22/2010 H6850-6851)
- Sep 23, 2010Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sep 22, 2010Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 111-616.
In the Congressional Record 2
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | Recorded votes H6942amend and reauthorize | — | Sep 23, 2010 |
| House | Debate and remarks H6850–H6852Text printed H6850 | Bart Stupak D-MI, Ed Whitfield R-KY, Frank Pallone, Jr. D-NJ, Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX | Sep 22, 2010 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Committee report
Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 4
- Aug 31, 2010H.R. 5710, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 28, 2010</p>
- Aug 31, 2010H.R. 5710, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 28, 2010
- Aug 27, 2010H.R. 5710, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 28, 2010</p>
- Aug 27, 2010H.R. 5710, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 28, 2010
Printed hearings 1
Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.
| Number | Hearing | Committee | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serial No. 111-146 | H.R. 5710, THE NATIONAL ALL SCHEDULES PRESCRIPTION ELECTRONIC REPORTING REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2010; AND H.R. 5809, THE SAFE DRUG DISPOSAL ACT OF 201075 pages | Energy and Commerce Committee | Jul 22, 2010 |
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| S 3575 | National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010 | Related bill | Jul 13, 2010 |
Titles 4
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To amend and reauthorize the controlled substance monitoring program under section 399O of the Public Health Service Act.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010
- Short Titles as Reported to House
- National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010
- Short Titles as Passed House
- National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2010
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Health.
Text 4
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Sep 24, 2010Referred in Senate
- Sep 23, 2010Engrossed in House
- Sep 22, 2010Reported in House
- Jul 1, 2010Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.
