To prohibit any increase in the number of members of the United States Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan.
Latest action · Oct 1, 2009 Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedOct 1, 2009
- Passed HouseNot reached
- Passed SenateNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Prohibits any funds from being obligated or expended to increase the number of U.S. Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan on the date of enactment of this Act.
Cosponsors 33
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Oct 1, 2009 to Jul 29, 2010, with 21 there on the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-FL | Alan Grayson | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-CA | Bob Filner | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-OH | Dennis J. Kucinich | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-CA | Diane E. Watson | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-MD | Donna F. Edwards | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-NY | Edolphus Towns | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-MO | Emanuel Cleaver | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-CA | Fortney Pete Stark | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-MA | James P. McGovern | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-WA | Jim McDermott | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-MI | John Conyers, Jr. | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-GA | John Lewis | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-MN | Keith Ellison | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-CA | Lynn C. Woolsey | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
| D-NY | Maurice D. Hinchey | Original | Oct 1, 2009 |
Actions 2
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Oct 1, 2009Introduced in House
- Oct 1, 2009Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security.
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Oct 1, 2009Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.