HR 3269 · 111th Congress 2009–2011, ended

Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009

Latest action · Aug 3, 2009 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJul 21, 2009
  2. Passed HouseJul 31, 2009
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require that any proxy or consent or authorization for an annual shareholders meeting provide for a separate shareholder vote to approve executive compensation for named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

States that the shareholder vote shall not be: (1) binding on the corporation or the board of directors; (2) construed as overruling a board decision, or as creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty by the board; or (3) construed as restricting or limiting shareholder ability to place executive compensation proposals within proxy materials.

Requires solicitations that seek shareholder approval of an acquisition, merger, consolidation, or proposed sale or other disposition of assets to disclose clearly and simply in the proxy or consent solicitation material any agreements or understandings with named executive officers of the disposing or the acquiring issuer concerning (golden parachute) compensation (present, deferred, or contingent) that is based upon or relates to such asset disposition, including the aggregate total compensation to or on behalf of such executive officer.

Requires separate shareholder approval of such golden parachute agreements or understandings and compensation, as disclosed, unless already subject to a shareholder vote at an annual shareholders meeting. States that a separate shareholder vote on golden parachute compensation shall not be: (1) binding on the issuer or its board of directors or the person making the solicitation; or (2) construed as overruling a decision by such person or issuer, or as creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty by any such person or issuer.

Requires certain institutional investment managers to report annually how they voted on any shareholder vote.

Authorizes the SEC, after taking into account the potential impact on smaller reporting issuers, to exempt certain categories of issuers from the requirements of this Act.

(Sec. 3) Directs the SEC to direct the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit the listing of any class of equity security of an issuer that does not comply with specified requirements for compensation committees (or equivalent bodies) established by and amongst an issuer's board of directors for the purpose of determining and approving the compensation arrangements for the issuer's executive officers.

Requires each member of the compensation committee of the issuer's board of directors to be independent. Prohibits any compensation committee member from accepting any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the issuer. Allows for SEC exemptions from such requirements for particular relationships.

Requires a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other adviser to an issuer's compensation committee to meet SEC independence standards.

Grants the compensation committee of each issuer discretionary authority to retain and obtain the advice of a compensation consultant meeting SEC independence standards. Requires any proxy or consent solicitation material for an annual shareholder meeting to disclose whether the issuer's compensation committee retained and obtained the advice of an independent compensation consultant.

Authorizes a compensation committee to retain and obtain the advice of independent counsel and other independent advisers.

Directs the SEC to study and report to Congress on the use of independent compensation consultants.

(Sec. 4) Directs federal regulators to prescribe jointly regulations requiring each covered financial institution to disclose the structures of all incentive-based compensation arrangements sufficient to determine whether the compensation structure: (1) is aligned with sound risk management; (2) is structured to account for the time horizon of risks; and (3) meets other criteria appropriate to reduce unreasonable incentives offered by such institutions for employees to take undue risks.

Requires such regulators to prescribe jointly regulations that prohibit any compensation structure or incentive-based payment arrangement that encourages inappropriate risks by financial institutions that could: (1) threaten the safety and soundness of covered financial institutions; or (2) present serious adverse effects upon economic conditions or financial stability.

Exempts covered financial institutions with assets of less than $1 billion from these compensation arrangement disclosure requirements.

Prohibits any such regulation from requiring the recovery (clawback) of incentive-based compensation under compensation arrangements in effect on the date of enactment of this Act if such an agreement is for a period of no more than 24 months. Declares that this Act shall neither prevent nor limit the recovery of incentive-based compensation under any other applicable law.

Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on whether there is a correlation between compensation structures and excessive risk taking. Requires the study, in determining whether a company failed, or nearly failed but for government assistance, to focus on: (1) companies that received exceptional assistance under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2009 (EESA) or other forms of significant government assistance, including under the Automotive Industry Financing Program, the Targeted Investment Program, the Asset Guarantee Program, and the Systemically Significant Failing Institutions Program; (2) the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae); (3) the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac); and (4) companies that participated in the SEC's Consolidated Supervised Entities Program as of January 2008.

Recorded votes 4

Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.

Roll callQuestionResultDate
House 686Passed237–185Jul 31, 2009
House 685Failed178–244Jul 31, 2009
House 684Failed179–244Jul 31, 2009
House 683Agreed to242–178Jul 31, 2009

Cosponsors 11

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jul 21, 2009 to Jul 23, 2009; 10 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-TXAl GreenOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-INAndré CarsonOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-CABrad ShermanOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-MIGary C. PetersOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-MNKeith EllisonOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-ILLuis V. GutierrezOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-OHMary Jo KilroyOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-NCMelvin L. WattOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-MAMichael E. CapuanoOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-TXRuben HinojosaOriginalJul 21, 2009
D-CAMaxine WatersJul 23, 2009

Committees 2

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseFinancial Services Committee
Referred Jul 21, 2009Markup Jul 28, 2009Reported Jul 30, 2009
SenateBanking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Referred Aug 3, 2009

Actions 24

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Aug 3, 2009Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
  2. Jul 31, 2009Rule H. Res. 697 passed House.
  3. Jul 31, 2009Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 697. (consideration: CR H9213-9233; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H9213-9215)
  4. Jul 31, 2009Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3269 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived.
  5. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3269.
  6. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H.R. 3269.
  7. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 697, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment.
  8. Jul 31, 2009POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Price (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  9. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 697, the House proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment in the nature of a substitute.
  10. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - Mr. Garrett (NJ) asked unanimous consent that debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment in the nature of a substitute be extended by 10 minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
  11. Jul 31, 2009POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garrett (NJ) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  12. Jul 31, 2009Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9240-9244)
  13. Jul 31, 2009Mr. Sessions moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations. (consideration: CR H9242-9243; text: CR H9242)
  14. Jul 31, 2009DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sessions motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the same back to the House with an amendment to instruct the Security Exchange Commission to identify all persons or entities engaged in activities to influence a vote.
  15. Jul 31, 2009On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 178 - 244 (Roll no. 685). (consideration: CR H9243)
  16. Jul 31, 2009Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 237 - 185 (Roll no. 686).
  17. Jul 31, 2009Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  18. Jul 30, 2009Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 111-236.
  19. Jul 30, 2009Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 131.
  20. Jul 30, 2009Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 697 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3269 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived.
  21. Jul 28, 2009Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  22. Jul 28, 2009Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 28.
  23. Jul 21, 2009Introduced in House
  24. Jul 21, 2009Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

In the Congressional Record 4

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E2220Spencer Bachus R-ALSep 9, 2009
HouseDebate and remarks H9211–H9213, H9213–H9233, H9240–H9244Text printed H9211, H9213–H9215Amendments H9225, H9226, H9227Motions H9242Recorded votes H9240, H9241, H9243McGovern motion to recommit (require disclosure of persons or organizations funding activities to influence shareholders votes)Frank amendment (prohibit regulations requiring the recovery of incentive based executive compensation)Garrett amendment (subsitute)Al Green D-TX, Alan Grayson D-FL, André Carson D-IN, Barney Frank D-MA (amendment), Bill Posey R-FL, Brad Miller D-NC, Brad Sherman D-CA, Chris Van Hollen D-MD, David Scott D-GA, Ed Perlmutter D-CO, J. Gresham Barrett R-SC, Jackie Speier D-CA, James P. McGovern D-MA, Jeb Hensarling R-TX, Jerry Lewis R-CA, John Campbell R-CA, Leonard Lance R-NJ, Melvin L. Watt D-NC, Michael N. Castle R-DE, Michele Bachmann R-MN, Pete Sessions R-TX (motion), Peter J. Roskam R-IL, Randy Neugebauer R-TX, Robert C. "Bobby" Scott D-VA, Ron Paul R-TX, Scott Garrett R-NJ (amendment), Sheila Jackson Lee D-TX, Spencer Bachus R-AL, Tom Price R-GA, Yvette D. Clarke D-NYJul 31, 2009
HouseDeclaratory Statements H9208—Jul 30, 2009
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E2022Mary Jo Kilroy D-OHJul 27, 2009

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Committee report

Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 2

  1. Jul 30, 2009H.R. 3269, Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Finaicial Services on July 28, 2009</p>
  2. Jul 30, 2009H.R. 3269, Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on Finaicial Services on July 28, 2009

Printed hearings 2

Hearings whose printed record names this bill, newest first: hearings on it, and wider hearings where it came up.

NumberHearingCommitteeHeld
Serial No. 111-98COMPENSATION IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY133 pagesFinancial Services CommitteeJan 22, 2010
S. Hrg. 111-315PROTECTING SHAREHOLDERS AND ENHANCING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE BY IMPROVING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE252 pagesBanking, Housing, and Urban Affairs CommitteeJul 29, 2009

CRS reports 1

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 1

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

Amendments 2

Amendments offered to this bill.

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Titles 4

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation and to prevent perverse incentives in the compensation practices of financial institutions.
Short Titles as Introduced
Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009
Short Titles as Reported to House
Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009
Short Titles as Passed House
Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Aug 3, 2009Referred in Senate
  2. Jul 31, 2009Engrossed in House
  3. Jul 30, 2009Reported in House
  4. Jul 21, 2009Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.