Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008
Latest action · Oct 1, 2008 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1104.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedJul 31, 2008
- Passed SenateNot reached
- Passed HouseNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008 - Expands the requirement that each head of an executive agency identify, in strategic information resources management plans, any major information technology acquisition program, or any phase or increment of such program, that has significantly deviated from the cost, performance, or schedule goals established for the program. Defines "significantly deviated" as earned value management variance that is at least 20% from the original baseline established at the commencement of an information technology acquisition program.
Requires each Chief Information Officer of a federal agency to: (1) identify its major IT investments that are most critical; and (2) designate those most mission critical IT investment projects as core IT investment projects or core projects after considering specified factors. Defines "IT investment project" as an information technology system or acquisition that: (1) requires special management attention due to its importance to the mission or function of its agency; (2) is for financial management and obligates more than $500 million annually; (3) has significant program or policy implications; (4) has high executive visibility; (5) has high development, operating, or maintenance costs; (6) is funded through other than direct appropriations; or (7) is defined as major by the agency's capital planning and investment control process.
Requires the project manager for an IT investment project to submit a report to the Chief Information Officer not later than 14 days after the end of each fiscal quarter (or upon making a determination that a project has significantly or grossly deviated since the issuance of any quarterly report) that includes: (1) a description of the cost, schedule, and performance of such projects; (2) the original and current project cost, schedule, and performance benchmarks; (3) the quarterly and cumulative cost, schedule, and performance variance related to each project; (4) any known, expected or anticipated changes to project schedule milestones or project performance benchmarks; (5) the current cost, schedule, and performance status of all projects previously identified as significantly deviated or grossly deviated (i.e., more than 40% variance from the original baseline); and (6) any corrective actions taken.
Requires the Chief Information Officer, upon receiving such a report, to: (1) determine if any project has significantly or grossly deviated and report such determination to the agency head; (2) report any such significant or gross deviations to appropriate congressional committees, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO); (3) develop and implement a remedial action plan to address gross deviations; and (4) establish a program to improve the information technology processes overseen by the Chief Information Officer.
Requires the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government and Information and Technology at OMB (the E-Gov Administrator) to establish an IT Strike Force to assist agencies in avoiding significant and gross deviations in the cost, schedule, and performance of IT investment projects and take specified actions to avoid or reduce such deviations.
Requires the OMB Director to include in the annual report to Congress on the Benefits of E-Government Initiatives a summary of the composition and activities of the IT Strike Force and its effectiveness.
Cosponsors 5
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jul 31, 2008 to Sep 8, 2008; 4 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-MO | Claire McCaskill | Original | Jul 31, 2008 |
| I-CT | Joseph I. Lieberman | Original | Jul 31, 2008 |
| R-MN | Norm Coleman | Original | Jul 31, 2008 |
| R-ME | Susan M. Collins | Original | Jul 31, 2008 |
| R-OH | George V. Voinovich | Sep 8, 2008 |
Committees 1
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| Senate | Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee | Referred Jul 31, 2008Markup Sep 23, 2008Reported Oct 1, 2008 |
| Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security Subcommittee | Referred Sep 10, 2008 |
Actions 7
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Oct 1, 2008Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Oct 1, 2008Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1104.
- Sep 23, 2008Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- Sep 10, 2008Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security.
- Jul 31, 2008Introduced in Senate
- Jul 31, 2008Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S7929)
- Jul 31, 2008Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S7929-7932)
In the Congressional Record 1
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senate | Debate and remarks S7929–S7933Text printed S7929–S7932 | Susan M. Collins R-ME, Thomas R. Carper D-DE (text) | Jul 31, 2008 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 2
- Oct 28, 2008S. 3384, Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008<p>Cost estimate for the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs on October 1, 2008</p>
- Oct 28, 2008S. 3384, Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008Cost estimate for the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs on October 1, 2008
CRS reports 1
Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.
Cite it 1
Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.
| Product | Title | Kind | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| R41293 | The Nunn-McCurdy Act: Background, Analysis, and Issues for Congress Archived | Report | May 12, 2016 |
Titles 3
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- A bill to amend section 11317 of title 40, United States Code, to require greater accountability for cost overruns on Federal IT investment projects.
- Short Titles as Introduced
- Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008
- Short Titles as Reported to Senate
- Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2008
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
- Congress
- Congressional oversight
- Congressional reporting requirements
- Cost control
- Economics and Public Finance
- Finance and Financial Sector
- Government Operations and Politics
- Government procurement
- Information technology
- Performance measurement
- Planning-programming-budgeting
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Strategic planning
Text 2
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Oct 1, 2008Reported to Senate
- Jul 31, 2008Introduced in Senate
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.