HR 2506 · 110th Congress 2007–2009, ended

Tule Lake Segregation Center Special Resource Study Act

Fact sheet

Latest action · Jun 4, 2007 Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMay 24, 2007
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Tule Lake Segregation Center Special Resource Study Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the national significance, suitability, and feasibility of including the Tule Lake Segregation Center in Modoc County, California, in the National Park System.

Cosponsors 4

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jun 5, 2007 to May 14, 2008.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-CADoris O. MatsuiJun 5, 2007
D-CAMichael M. HondaApr 30, 2008
D-WAJay InsleeMay 12, 2008
D-HIMazie K. HironoMay 14, 2008

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jun 4, 2007Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
  2. May 24, 2007Introduced in House
  3. May 24, 2007Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 1476Tule Lake Segregation Center Special Resource Study ActIdentical billApr 10, 2008

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. May 24, 2007Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.