To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 502 East Cotati Avenue in Cotati, California, as the "Arturo L. Ibleto Post Office Building".
Latest action · Jun 24, 2022 Became Public Law No: 117-155.
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedFeb 2, 2021
- Passed HouseFeb 8, 2022
- Passed SenateMay 25, 2022
- To the PresidentJun 22, 2022
- Became lawJun 24, 2022Public Law 117-155
Summary
This bill designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 502 East Cotati Avenue in Cotati, California, as the Arturo L. Ibleto Post Office Building.
Recorded votes 1
Newest first. Open one to see how every member voted.
| Roll call | Question | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| House 41 | On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended | Passed422–4 | Feb 8, 2022 |
Cosponsors 52
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Feb 2, 2021 to Jun 24, 2021; 14 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-CA | Alan S. Lowenthal | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Ami Bera | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Barbara Lee | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Eric Swalwell | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Grace F. Napolitano | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Jerry McNerney | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Jim Costa | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Judy Chu | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Katie Porter | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Linda T. Sánchez | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Lucille Roybal-Allard | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Mark DeSaulnier | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Mark Takano | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Tony Cárdenas | Original | Feb 2, 2021 |
| D-CA | Adam B. Schiff | Feb 25, 2021 |
Committees 2
Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.
| Chamber | Committee | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| House | Oversight and Government Reform Committee | Referred Feb 2, 2021Markup Jun 29, 2021 |
| Senate | Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee | Referred Feb 9, 2022Markup Mar 30, 2022Reported Apr 4, 2022 |
Actions 21
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Jun 24, 2022Signed by President.
- Jun 24, 2022Became Public Law No: 117-155.
- Jun 22, 2022Presented to President.
- May 25, 2022Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2679)
- May 25, 2022Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Apr 4, 2022Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters without amendment. Without written report.
- Apr 4, 2022Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 328.
- Mar 30, 2022Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
- Feb 9, 2022Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Feb 8, 2022Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1059-1060)
- Feb 8, 2022Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 422 - 4, 1 Present (Roll no. 41). (text: 02/01/2022 CR H318)
- Feb 8, 2022Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Feb 8, 2022The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
- Feb 1, 2022Ms. Wasserman Schultz moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- Feb 1, 2022Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H318-319)
- Feb 1, 2022DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 735.
- Feb 1, 2022At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- Jun 29, 2021Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- Jun 29, 2021Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
- Feb 2, 2021Introduced in House
- Feb 2, 2021Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
In the Congressional Record 5
Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.
| Where | In the Record | Members | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senate | Debate and remarks S2679 | — | May 25, 2022 |
| Senate | Debate and remarks S2540 | Dianne Feinstein D-CA | May 17, 2022 |
| House | Recorded votes H1059designateLists H1060Votes recorded by proxy on H.R. 735, Arthur Louis Ibleto Post Office Building, Cotati, CA | — | Feb 8, 2022 |
| Extensions | Debate and remarks E96 | Mike Thompson D-CA | Feb 2, 2022 |
| House | Debate and remarks H318, H319Text printed H318 | Debbie Wasserman Schultz D-FL, Jake LaTurner R-KS | Feb 1, 2022 |
Research
What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.
Constitutional authority
The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 167, no. 19, February 2, 2021, page H281.
Titles 2
Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.
- Official Title as Introduced
- To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 502 East Cotati Avenue in Cotati, California, as the "Arthur Luis Ibleto Post Office Building".
- Official Titles as Amended by House
- To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 502 East Cotati Avenue in Cotati, California, as the "Arturo L. Ibleto Post Office Building".
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics.
Text 5
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- —Enrolled Bill
- Apr 4, 2022Reported to Senate
- Feb 9, 2022Referred in Senate
- Feb 8, 2022Engrossed in House
- Feb 2, 2021Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.