HR 1454 · 114th Congress 2015–2017, ended

Modernized Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 2015

Latest action · Apr 21, 2015 Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedMar 18, 2015
  2. Passed HouseNot reached
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Modernized Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 2015

Amends the federal criminal code to expand the definition of "armor piercing ammunition" to include a projectile that may be used in a handgun and that is determined by the Attorney General to be capable of penetrating body armor.

Requires the Attorney General to: (1) promulgate standards for the uniform testing of projectiles against the Body Armor Exemplar (body armor that the Attorney General determines meets minimum standards for the protection of law enforcement officers), taking into account variations in performance related to the type of handgun used, the length of the barrel, the amount and kind of powder used, and the projectile's design; and (2) assess and, as appropriate, modify the standards every three years or more frequently if warranted by technological advances.

Cosponsors 20

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Mar 18, 2015 to Jul 8, 2016; 16 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-NYCarolyn B. MaloneyOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-NYCharles B. RangelOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-FLCorrine BrownOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-RIDavid N. CicillineOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-OREarl BlumenauerOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-DCEleanor Holmes NortonOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-CAKaren BassOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-FLKathy CastorOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-FLLois FrankelOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-CAMark TakanoOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-PAMatt CartwrightOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-CAMichael M. HondaOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-AZRaúl M. GrijalvaOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-CASam FarrOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-NYSteve IsraelOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-NYYvette D. ClarkeOriginalMar 18, 2015
D-NYEliot L. EngelApr 16, 2015
D-MANiki TsongasNov 3, 2015
D-ORSuzanne BonamiciDec 1, 2015
D-TNSteve CohenJul 8, 2016

Committees 1

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Mar 18, 2015
Crime and Federal Government Surveillance Subcommittee
Referred Apr 21, 2015

Actions 3

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Apr 21, 2015Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
  2. Mar 18, 2015Introduced in House
  3. Mar 18, 2015Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Constitutional authority

Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted to Congress under Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.

The sponsor’s statement, as printed in the Congressional Record, vol. 161, no. 46, March 18, 2015, page H1771.

Titles 2

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To modify the definition of armor piercing ammunition to better capture its capabilities.
Short Titles as Introduced
Modernized Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 2015

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Mar 18, 2015Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.