Expressing the sense of the Congress that tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies have historically and continue to provide critical benefits to Americans and United States communities.
Latest action · Feb 26, 2015 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Progress
Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A concurrent resolution must be agreed to by both chambers, but it is not presented to the President and does not become law.
- IntroducedFeb 26, 2015
- Agreed to in HouseNot reached
- Agreed to in SenateNot reached
Summary
Expresses the sense of Congress that the tax exemption of fraternal benefit societies continues to generate significant returns to society and that the work of such societies should continue to be promoted.
Cosponsors 105
Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Feb 26, 2015 to Sep 28, 2016, with 1 there on the day it was introduced.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-WI | Ron Kind | Original | Feb 26, 2015 |
| R-WI | Reid J. Ribble | Mar 16, 2015 | |
| D-MA | Richard E. Neal | Mar 16, 2015 | |
| R-OH | Patrick J. Tiberi | Mar 17, 2015 | |
| R-WI | Sean P. Duffy | Mar 18, 2015 | |
| R-MI | Tim Walberg | Mar 19, 2015 | |
| R-WA | Cathy McMorris Rodgers | Mar 23, 2015 | |
| R-IL | John Shimkus | Mar 23, 2015 | |
| R-SD | Kristi L. Noem | Mar 23, 2015 | |
| R-WI | F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. | Apr 13, 2015 | |
| R-MO | Blaine Luetkemeyer | Apr 14, 2015 | |
| R-WA | David G. Reichert | Apr 15, 2015 | |
| D-WI | Gwen Moore | Apr 21, 2015 | |
| D-WI | Mark Pocan | Apr 23, 2015 | |
| R-WY | Cynthia M. Lummis | Apr 28, 2015 |
Actions 2
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Feb 26, 2015Introduced in House
- Feb 26, 2015Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Taxation.
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Feb 26, 2015Introduced in House
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.