HRES 736 · 113th Congress 2013–2015, ended

Affirming the importance of the Electronic Proving Ground at Fort Huachuca, Arizona, to the United States Armed Forces and national security on its 60th anniversary.

Fact sheet

Latest action · Sep 18, 2014 Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Progress

Where this resolution reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried. A simple resolution is the business of one chamber alone: it is not sent to the other chamber or to the President, and does not become law.

  1. IntroducedSep 18, 2014
  2. Agreed to in HouseNot reached

Summary

Recognizes that members of the Armed Forces face changing battlefield threats and unique enemy challenges that call for proven equipment tested at the Electronic Proving Ground at Fort Huachuca, Arizona.

Supports the long term viability of Fort Huachuca and its Electronic Proving Ground.

Expresses appreciation to soldiers and civilians for their 60 years of work at the Electronic Proving Ground and their service to the United States.

Cosponsors 8

Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Sep 18, 2014.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-AZAnn KirkpatrickOriginalSep 18, 2014
R-AZDavid SchweikertOriginalSep 18, 2014
D-AZEd PastorOriginalSep 18, 2014
D-AZKyrsten SinemaOriginalSep 18, 2014
R-AZMatt SalmonOriginalSep 18, 2014
R-AZPaul A. GosarOriginalSep 18, 2014
D-AZRaúl M. GrijalvaOriginalSep 18, 2014
R-AZTrent FranksOriginalSep 18, 2014

Actions 2

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Sep 18, 2014Introduced in House
  2. Sep 18, 2014Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Sep 18, 2014Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this resolution on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.