Statutory Time-Periods Technical Amendments Act of 2009
Latest action · Mar 18, 2009 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3375)
Progress
Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.
- IntroducedMar 18, 2009
- Passed SenateNot reached
- Passed HouseNot reached
- To the PresidentNot reached
- Became lawNot reached
Summary
Statutory Time-Periods Technical Amendments Act of 2009 - Amends federal bankruptcy, criminal, and civil law, as well as the Classified Information Procedures Act and the Controlled Substances Act, to extend from 5 to 7 days, and from 10 to 14 days, counting holidays and weekends, specified deadlines affecting court proceedings to harmonize them with recent amendments to the federal time-computation rules intended to provide predictability and uniformity to the current process of calculating court deadlines.
Cosponsors 3
Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Mar 18, 2009.
| Seat | Cosponsor | Signed on | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-PA | Arlen Specter | Original | Mar 18, 2009 |
| R-AL | Jeff Sessions | Original | Mar 18, 2009 |
| D-RI | Sheldon Whitehouse | Original | Mar 18, 2009 |
Actions 3
Everything that happened, newest first.
- Mar 18, 2009Introduced in Senate
- Mar 18, 2009Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3375)
- Mar 18, 2009Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3374-3375)
Related bills 1
Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.
| Bill | Title | Relationship | Latest action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR 1626 | Statutory Time-Periods Technical Amendments Act of 2009 | Identical bill | May 7, 2009 |
Subjects
Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Law.
Text 1
Each version as it was printed, newest first.
- Mar 18, 2009Introduced in Senate
Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.