HR 3013 · 110th Congress 2007–2009, ended

Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007

Latest action · Nov 14, 2007 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJul 12, 2007
  2. Passed HouseNov 13, 2007
  3. Passed SenateNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007 - Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit any U.S. agent or attorney, in any federal investigation or criminal or civil enforcement matter, from demanding, requesting, or conditioning treatment ("giving cooperation credit") on the disclosure by an organization (or affiliated person) of any communication protected by the attorney-client privilege or any attorney work product.

Prohibits a U.S. agent or attorney from conditioning a civil or criminal charging decision relating to an organization (or affiliated person) on one or more specified actions, or from using one or more such actions as a factor in determining whether an organization or affiliated person is cooperating with the government.

Numbers among the actions a U.S. agent or attorney may not use as a charging decision condition or a cooperation-determining factor: (1) any valid assertion of the attorney-client privilege or privilege for attorney work product; (2) the provision of counsel to, or contribution to the legal defense fees or expenses of, an employee of the organization; (3) entry into a joint-defense, information-sharing, or common-interest agreement with an employee of the organization if the organization determines it has a common interest in defending against the investigation or enforcement matter; (4) the sharing of relevant information with an employee; or (5) a failure to terminate an employee's employment, or otherwise sanction an employee, because of the employee's decision to exercise his or her constitutional rights or other legal protections in response to a government request.

Prohibits a U.S. agent or attorney from demanding or requesting that an organization or an affiliated person not take any such action.

Declares that this Act does not affect any other federal statute that may authorize, in the course of an examination or inspection, a U.S. agent or attorney to require or compel the production of attorney-client privileged material or attorney work product.

Declares that the prohibition against conditioning a charging decision does not apply to charging an organization (or affiliated person) for certain conduct under a federal law which makes that conduct in itself an offense. Specifies as conduct which may under federal law constitute an offense, and so be exempted from this prohibition: (1) the provision of counsel to, or contribution to the legal defense fees or expenses of, an employee of the organization; (2) entry into a joint defense, information sharing, or common interest agreement with an employee of that organization if the organization determines it has a common interest in defending against the investigation or enforcement matter; and (3) the sharing of information relevant to the investigation or enforcement matter with an employee of the organization.


Cosponsors 11

Members who signed on, in the order they did. Signatures ran from Jul 12, 2007 to Jul 31, 2007; 8 are original cosponsors, there from the day it was introduced.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-ALArtur DavisOriginalJul 12, 2007
R-CADaniel E. LungrenOriginalJul 12, 2007
R-NCHoward CobleOriginalJul 12, 2007
R-VAJ. Randy ForbesOriginalJul 12, 2007
D-MIJohn Conyers, Jr.OriginalJul 12, 2007
R-TXLamar SmithOriginalJul 12, 2007
R-ILPeter J. RoskamOriginalJul 12, 2007
R-FLTom FeeneyOriginalJul 12, 2007
D-MABill DelahuntJul 27, 2007
D-NYJerrold NadlerJul 31, 2007
D-ILMelissa L. BeanJul 31, 2007

Committees 2

Where it was sent and what each committee and subcommittee did with it, in order.

ChamberCommitteeWhat it did
HouseJudiciary Committee
Referred Jul 12, 2007Markup Aug 1, 2007Reported Nov 13, 2007
Crime and Federal Government Surveillance Subcommittee
Referred Jul 20, 2007Markup Jul 24, 2007Reported Jul 24, 2007
SenateJudiciary Committee
Referred Nov 15, 2007

Actions 15

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Nov 14, 2007Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. Nov 13, 2007Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-445.
  3. Nov 13, 2007Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 276.
  4. Nov 13, 2007Mr. Scott (VA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  5. Nov 13, 2007Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H13562-13564)
  6. Nov 13, 2007DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3013.
  7. Nov 13, 2007Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H13562-13563)
  8. Nov 13, 2007Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  9. Aug 1, 2007Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  10. Aug 1, 2007Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
  11. Jul 24, 2007Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  12. Jul 24, 2007Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote .
  13. Jul 20, 2007Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
  14. Jul 12, 2007Introduced in House
  15. Jul 12, 2007Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

In the Congressional Record 2

Days the Record’s own index lists this bill, newest first, with the pages and the members it names. Pages starting H are the House, S the Senate, E Extensions of Remarks.

WhereIn the RecordMembersDate
ExtensionsDebate and remarks E2135Robert C. "Bobby" Scott D-VASep 28, 2008
HouseDebate and remarks H13562–H13564Text printed H13562Bob Goodlatte R-VA, Robert C. "Bobby" Scott D-VANov 13, 2007

Research

What has been written about this bill: committee reports, cost estimates, the sponsor’s authority statement, printed hearings and the Congressional Research Service’s work.

Committee report

Congressional Budget Office cost estimates 4

  1. Aug 17, 2007H.R. 3013, Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on August 2, 2007</p>
  2. Aug 17, 2007H.R. 3013, Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007<p>Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on August 2, 2007</p>
  3. Aug 17, 2007H.R. 3013, Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on August 2, 2007
  4. Aug 17, 2007H.R. 3013, Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007Cost estimate for the bill as ordered reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary on August 2, 2007

CRS reports 2

Congressional Research Service work that CRS links to this bill or the law it became, newest first.

Cite it 2

Products on other subjects that cite it, usually among other measures.

Related bills 2

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

BillTitleRelationshipLatest action
S 186Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007Identical billSep 18, 2007
S 3217Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2008Related billJun 26, 2008

Titles 3

Every title it has carried, official and short, at each stage.

Official Title as Introduced
To provide appropriate protection to attorney-client privileged communications and attorney work product.
Short Titles as Introduced
Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007
Short Titles as Passed House
Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2007

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement.

Text 4

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Nov 14, 2007Referred in Senate
  2. Nov 13, 2007Reported in House
  3. Nov 13, 2007Engrossed in House
  4. Jul 12, 2007Introduced in House

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov; cost estimates are the Congressional Budget Office's, and the hearings are the printed hearings GovInfo publishes, which can appear months after the hearing.