S 1482 · 109th Congress 2005–2007, ended

A bill to amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to provide for binding arbitration for Gila River Indian Community Reservation Contracts.

Fact sheet

Latest action · Jul 27, 2005 Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

Progress

Where this bill reached, and when. A stage with no date was not reached; one that failed a vote and later carried shows the date it carried.

  1. IntroducedJul 26, 2005
  2. Passed SenateJul 26, 2005
  3. Passed HouseNot reached
  4. To the PresidentNot reached
  5. Became lawNot reached

Summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Amends federal Indian law to provide for binding arbitration for Gila River Indian Community Reservation contracts (including leases, as currently covered by such law).

Cosponsors 1

Members who signed on, in the order they did. All signed on Jul 26, 2005.

SeatCosponsorSigned on
D-NDByron L. DorganOriginalJul 26, 2005

Actions 6

Everything that happened, newest first.

  1. Jul 27, 2005Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  2. Jul 27, 2005Received in the House.
  3. Jul 27, 2005Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
  4. Jul 26, 2005Introduced in Senate
  5. Jul 26, 2005Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9053-9055; text as passed Senate: S9054)

Related bills 1

Companion bills and other measures the record links to this one.

Subjects

Assigned by the Library of Congress. Policy area: Native Americans.

Text 1

Each version as it was printed, newest first.

  1. Jul 26, 2005Considered and Passed Senate

Support LegiList

This page is free, carries no paywall, and is built and maintained by one person. If the record here is useful to you, a few dollars keeps it going.

Processed by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never sees card details.

Everything here is as published by Congress: the summary is the Congressional Research Service's, the action wording is the clerks', and the subjects are the Library of Congress's. How far it got is read from the actions themselves, taking the most recent one of each kind, so a bill that failed a vote and later passed is shown as having passed. Records come from this bill on Congress.gov and govinfo.gov.